Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Sept 1, 2022 16:21:58 GMT -8
I just finished Strategic Air Command. It needed more planes, less Mrs. Holland, although she plays a character that is about as hard to find as the Yeti: a supportive wife.
I hadn't noticed from just the photo, but on the B-36 they have some jet booster engines on the outer edges of the wings. Also, I wonder if anyone can tell me what "arm prop" means. They used this command a couple times as they were nearly touching down (or had just touched down), but before reversing the engines.
For a piece of no-doubt Air Force-supported propaganda, they don't sugarcoat service in SAC: Low pay, long hours, wives that will hate you for being away so much, and crappy amenities. Maybe part of the thrust of this movie was to get better funding from Congress.
But I enjoyed the movie. Major General Stewart was an accomplished airman and a hell of an American. Whether he did or not in the film, he could actually fly those planes.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Sept 2, 2022 13:26:51 GMT -8
Can you imagine the stresses on the air frame where those two wings join the body of that B-36?
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Sept 2, 2022 13:32:48 GMT -8
I remember the B-58 Hustler as a kid. It was very cool and sleek. It screamed power just sitting on the tarmac.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Sept 2, 2022 14:58:55 GMT -8
I'm sure an engineer could show me the numbers. But it's hard to believe. Not only do those wings have to carry the weight of the engines and fuel, but the whole aircraft itself when aloft. You can see some old WWII footage of B-17s in a battle. I've never seen a wing bend. But they will give way if shot up a bit. I think the Flying Fortress could limp home on two engines if the Me 109 didn't get to them first. This overview document mentions that the FF could continue a mission on only three engines. I think there are one or two movies – Memphis Belle (movie and documentary), Twelve O'Clock High -- that give you an idea of just how difficult these missions were for the crew. Cold. Loud. Cramped. Vibrating. And extremely dangerous. Who would volunteer for such service? I saw a bit of some chick comedian's act the other day on YouTube. I don’t know who it was. But she said something like, "I could conquer this entire generation with just a jar of peanut butter." How true. Lucky we're moving to drones because they'd probably find few people who would go on these high-risk missions.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Sept 2, 2022 15:31:06 GMT -8
I had an old friend who was in the 8th Airforce during WWII. He was navigator/bombardier in a B-17 and flew, 30 missions. He loved the plane.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Sept 3, 2022 8:56:29 GMT -8
I'm into my second episode of RAF Bomber Command. (Click on the link and you can watch this right in your browser.) You access this via Amazon Prime but is watched via the integrated Freevee channel. The advertising breaks are slightly on the side of annoying, but not excessive. This is a fairly fine-grained series. You start with Germany overrunning Norway and then France. Bomber Command did not yet have the planes nor the doctrine in place to combat this onslaught effectively, to put it mildly. They were losing planes in yuge numbers, especially with misguided attempts at bombing in daylight without fighter escort. They fairly quickly moved to nighttime only bombing where loses went from about one-in-two planes per sortie to one in two hundred. Soon, as you all know, England had to pull out and leave France to its fate while it prepared for the battle to come. They were losing too many planes, both fighters and bombers. And they barely had enough left for a modicum of cover for the Dunkirk evacuation. It really is amazing the effort that Bomber Command put into offensive operations, basically from day-one. They may have been short of planes, but they went on the attack. This is a six-part series that progresses you through the operations. It's not really an overview in terms of, say, taking looks back or to the side at the construction of new (or old) bombers. This is sort of a seat-of-the-pants look at the unfolding battle in chronological order. There are other documentaries that will cover in depth the development and history of any single bomber. And those are good. But I like the overall unfolding view this gives you.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Feb 26, 2024 11:51:42 GMT -8
Kunstler's piece for this week. He smells a reaction coming and gives a concise history of the rise and fall of the Jacobins of the French Revolution. He explains how, as I have often said, that the leftists follow the same play book. Throughout history, the revolutions caused by these people are just variations on a theme or two. The most basic themes being the destruction of the family, religion and traditional culture. The Thermidor Reaction Is Near
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Feb 27, 2024 10:31:27 GMT -8
There certainly ought to be some kind of reckoning. But although Kunstler's vision is suitably apocalyptic, I don't think the Woke Apocalypse is coming anytime soon.
It reminds me of a video I watched just yesterday. Some yute was going on about how pirating music was really no big thing and even the fault of the music companies for making it so easy. You see, he said (with the anti-piracy campaigns of the music companies as an example), people just don't like to be told what to do. (The video below starts at this point.) Yours truly commented (which I can't find now...it may have been deleted): "Given the easy and complete acquiescence to all the insane COVID restrictions, it's clear that the idea that today's yutes – or any other group – are "rebels" is purely an affectation."
We might suppose that people are "mad as hell and aren't going to take it anymore." But there are few signs that this is so and abundant signs of the contrary.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Feb 27, 2024 10:43:08 GMT -8
I wonder if that video is AI generated? The voice certainly has that irritating flat, nasal tone that one encounters when watching many videos that have electronic voices narrating i/o of actual humans.
Maybe he is just trying to copy the voice. If so, he has achieve the same level of annoying blandness, odd intonation and slight mispronunciation that I can't stand.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Feb 27, 2024 11:02:17 GMT -8
Mr. Kung, you don't hand out gold stars often. But that is a whopper. Or perhaps it's more along the line of the Fickle Finger of Fate award. A back-handed compliment as potent as that of Jimmy Conners.
Now that you mention it, that voice does sound a bit computer-generated. But I think most yutes are fairly RG&A. (Robotic, Glib, and Obnoxious.) Something tells me that A.I. might have at least some semblance of artificial dignity whereby they would not stoop so low as to mimic this yute.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Jul 9, 2024 8:37:38 GMT -8
This short piece by Prager reminds me of conversations I have had over the years. One in particular comes to mind. It was with an old Jewish friend who was somewhat of a liberal. He made the statement "that more wars have been started because of religion that anything else." He was, I believed, alluding to how Christians started wars. Of course, I couldn't resist and told him that was nonsense. I then started to list, backwards starting with Vietnam, wars through the ages. Vietnam, Korea, WWII, WWI, The Spanish American War, The Civil War, The War of the Mexican Cession, The War of 1812, The Revolution...None were religious. And those were just American wars. By this time, my friend was somewhat sour and told me to stop. I had made my point. I admit that I am very particular about people spouting nonsense, especially when trying to make some political point using "history." One thing I believe Prager should not have mentioned in his piece is the fact than many people died from disease brought from the Old World. There is a huge difference between you catching a disease from me and dying because of it, and me murdering you. Which is more deadly, religion or equality?
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jul 11, 2024 16:56:40 GMT -8
Yep. People believe a lot of nonsense. But if they want to believe that religion causes war, they need to point out Islam and India. They need to read some history. Islam is a murderous religion just as Nazism and Communism are murderous secular philosophies.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Jul 11, 2024 18:00:58 GMT -8
I can take a fair amount of nonsense from the average Joe who is neither educated, nor particularly intelligent. I have to admit that I can get very irritated when people, who I know are educated and intelligent, spout nonsense. I have found that they do so mainly based on their bias, not on demonstrative facts.
|
|