Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Sept 9, 2022 9:29:44 GMT -8
You know you're getting old when Apple dangles out the new tech and you just yawn. Actually, Apple has been bamboozling with their tech for some time now, so even when young, I took everything they said and built with a grain of salt. But now they have the Apple Watch Ultra. It's a big, thick, honking sports watch with (at best) 36 hours of battery life. It's (apparently) made for "extreme" hikers, divers, or people who are on a mission to mars. Perhaps the heaviest part is the price: $799.00. As one YouTube jockey noted, 36 hours is nowhere near enough for those who go off hiking into the backwoods, especially since Garmin has watches that will last for days, if not weeks. So who is this over-priced watch meant for? One commenter said it brilliantly: Note that I have an Apple Watch 4 and it's a great egg timer and grocery list keeper. I'm not kidding. Those are its main uses by far. Oh, and it actually has a great weather app. Make that three things I commonly use it for, day to day. But the watch is just too bulky and thick. I would never buy another one this big. It was a novelty for a while but the novelty has worn off. It's still useful, but unless you are on a flight to mars or a hike up Everest (and even then), you wouldn't want to actually wear the yuge hunk of the Apple Watch Ultra on your wrist that is far bigger than the one I have, which I think is still too big...unless, of course, the point was to do some fashion virtue-signalling. It's funny reading all the positive comments. Maybe I am indeed getting old. But I think people are just being incredulous. One note: If you go to Apple's home page, they have a nice tribute to the Queen.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jul 22, 2023 19:00:31 GMT -8
My brother is always on the lookout for Mac products when he makes his daily sweep through St. Vinny's and some other thrift stores. What he found yesterday was an Apple Thunderbolt 27" Display for $20.00. It works and is in fine to very-fine condition. These originally sold for a thousand bucks. This was a display not on my radar. When my brother texted me some photos of it to ask if I wanted it, I wasn't really sure what it was. This is a really niche produce. It works only with Macs that have Thunderbolt built-in. That is, you can't use it with our PC. (This is Apple, remember. Doing dumb things and somehow making a lot of money is a mystery even God can't solve.) And this display would work with a modern Mac today, no problem, since they all have Thunderbolt ports. You'd just need a Thunderbolt 2 to Thunderbolt 3 adapter. If one day I buy a little Mac Mini, this would be the perfect monitor for it. These displays are really a display (which is the exact same display as in my 27" iMac) combined with a docking station. They were made with Apple's laptops in mind. With a laptop, you could just plug in the one (or two) connectors and have all your peripherals (as well as the monitor, of course) instantly connected, turning your mobile laptop into a desktop machine. Actually, I already have a CalDigit Thunderbolt Station 2, but the extra USB 2.0 ports on the back of the Thunderbolt Display have already come in handy. This display has been put to use as an second (extended) monitor replacing the smaller monitor I had attached to the iMac. That monitor was beginning to show signs of age. It was starting to do some strange things, had a dark stripe on the right side, but generally was working. It's now been moved to an XP machine that hand been in mothballs simply because I had no display for it. The biggest thrill is the twenty bucks. These things are still selling for $300.00 or more (if in good shape) on eBay.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Apr 26, 2024 21:33:07 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Apr 27, 2024 15:19:12 GMT -8
Much of what comes out of Silicon Valley is paraphernalia which is completely extraneous to life. One can only hope that these goggles will fail. It has been my experience that those who are looking for an "alternative reality" have already found it with dope. Why buy an expensive electrical device?
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Apr 27, 2024 17:29:01 GMT -8
Had these goggles been invented to help Neil Armstrong land on the lunar surface, I would applaud them. If they assisted a doctor with remote surgery, then bravo. But $3500 for a fancy set of goggles to watch a movie or play a game? You have to be one Kool-aid drinking Apple butt-licker to pay the Apple tax for the privilege. $250.00, tops, would be about right to have one for the occasional movie or game. I think eventually something like this could become popular. But there is the aspect of it where it just looks dumb. That article noted that there are no photos of the Apple executives wearing the goggles. That's telling. They won't eat their own dog food, so to speak. Once you're talking smaller, lighter, and cheaper, then that might be something to explore. Right now, it's a very expensive proof-of-concept. And most who have used it say the concept has worked very well technically. But there is that concern about whether people, even in this age of relative isolation, want to isolate themselves further with VR goggles. For gaming? Sure. But I can't be the only one who hates the idea even of 3D movies and having to wear glasses to watch them. It's just so intrusive. Although Apple shows technical prowess with the production of these goggles, one wonders if DEI isn't starting to creep into their marketing department.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 9, 2024 16:11:46 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on May 9, 2024 16:39:26 GMT -8
What idiot conceived that commercial? Then, what idiot approved the commercial? Finally, what idiot made the commercial?
Only idiots, disconnected from reality, could have conceived, approved and made such a piece of nihilistic rubbish. Everything about it is offensive. Perfect for the communist-Marxist-globalist totalitarians whose controlling vision is based on the lie that man is marching on from the past, which was terribly flawed and best forgotten, to the future which will be just about perfect.
Who needs a real piano when you can have an iPad as an ersatz Steinway. Who needs a ball when one can watch a virtual Spalding bouncing on a computer screen? Who needs a friend or family when simulacrums can be created, improved and re-created digitally?
Sometimes the demons accidentally expose who they really are, without meaning to.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 9, 2024 17:26:31 GMT -8
Cook is a homosexual. He left good judgment along the side of the road quite a while ago.
You have stared fully into the heart of nihilistic darkness.
Pretty much.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 10, 2024 7:25:06 GMT -8
I read last night that they are pulling the ad. The tone-deafness of it is astonishing.
And it coincides, apparently and appropriately, with a number of artists suing ChatGPT for basically gobbling up their artistic content (as part of the "training" process). I hope they win, although this is an internecine battle. So a pox on all of their houses.
It's completely true that these electronic devices and apps are specifically designed to get people unhealthily hooked on them. Oh, they have the shtick of the "Screen Time" feature on the iPhone which supposedly can be set up to warn you that you've been viewing too long. But it's just CYA stuff, completely for show. Good god, the Apple tech titans would condemn you all to hell as long as they could sell phones.
And such phony disclaimers and warnings are directly akin to the "Gambling hotline" (Do you have a problem with a gambling addiction?) numbers they put in small print underneath the ads promoting gambling, which even go so far as offering you $150.00 in real cash credit to get you started. That's absolutely trying to get you hooked. And the disclaimers are little better than CYA stuff, if not (to my mind) a direct way of mocking the corruptness of it all.
The NHL broadcasts are full of these, gambling having become tightly integrated into the money-making aspect of the sport. It's actually unseemly, to the extent that anything can be unseemly these days.
Tim Cook is a corrupt individual, and not just because he's a homosexual. But that certainly doesn't help.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on May 10, 2024 7:39:20 GMT -8
Shortly after I posted my comments on the ad, I was thinking how simple it would have been to make virtually the same ad, but with a positive slant. Instead of crushing and destroying everything, why not steadily shrink the various items until they could all be slipped into a new iPad? In such a way, one is not destroying the past, but making much more of it available to people in a handy, convenient platform, being positive and creative.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on May 10, 2024 9:41:26 GMT -8
As I recall, there was a proliferation of such disclaimers starting in the 1980s. As I noted at the time, these were a sure sign of a sick society. They were proof that scumbag ambulance-chasing lawyers had burrowed their way deeply into all areas of our nation. On the one hand, normal institutions had to turn their energies to avoiding frivolous law suits and on the other, deceitful types could promote all sorts of damaging goods and activities, yet dishonestly cover themselves legally and "morally" with such warnings.
Pusher to addict: "I'm warning you that shooting up heroin is bad for your health."
Addict to pusher: "I appreciate your concern, shut up and give me the stuff."
Pusher to addict: "Please sign this disclaimer."
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 10, 2024 11:59:45 GMT -8
Your idea for the commercial is so obviously better, you wonder why kind of sick individual would get his or her jollies from portraying all that classic hands-on good stuff getting slowly crushed. Sick bastards. And I do think they are sick.
And yet name me a commercial these days that isn't one or more of the following: Condescending, stupid, woke. dishonest, juvenile.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 10, 2024 18:38:10 GMT -8
I think Nolte made an ass out of himself with this opinion. I disagree. The optics on this are terrible. The fact is, this tech crap is indeed replacing more hands-on physical technology. Do I want to watch Itzhak Perlman rubbing his fingers across an iPad or do I want to watch him playing a Stradivarius? It matters that these tech titans are spoiling and helping to destroy so much that is good. Nolte is hysterical and I guess believes that everyone who doesn't like this ad is a big baby. Well, no doubt many big babies are included in those who object. But if this asshole could see past his nose, he would see there was a principle involved here that exists whether or not supported by big babies. What an asshole.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on May 10, 2024 19:01:43 GMT -8
Let me be diplomatic and say that I have always considered Nolte a third-rate wanna-be with little taste. He has all the depth of water evaporating on a hot driveway. But let's be generous and put that down to the fact that he makes a living critiquing films and such. One can be only so honest when one's living is dependent upon one's reviews. Or maybe he is just a dolt.
On the other hand, I could speculate that Nolte is not above receiving payment from companies like Apple for his comments. Is he such a whore? I don't know.
The iPad ad's infamy has spread so far that Steve Bannon played in twice on his War Room program today and he obliterated the thing.
I will take it even further. The ad, and Apple amongst other companies, is praising the digital over the organic/physical/biological. The virtual over the real. Our psychopathic overlords what to confuse everyone to the point of our not being able to discern reality from illusion. Already they are selling nothing as something. All the virtual reality stuff.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 11, 2024 6:51:29 GMT -8
We'll add that to your book of analogies.
I'll see if I can hunt that down. Always love a good Apple-bashing.
Exactly. And the evidence is in: Smart phones (the iPad being a larger version of one) are not conducive to one's mental health. I read books and articles on mine. That's about it, although I have tried to make use of it as a graphic device, using the iPad versions of the Affinity apps.
There's another Asimovian principle there (not that he would have stated it). And it was mentioned in one of the articles I read about this: Virtual reality inherently disconnects you from the world.
Apple's own use-case ads show a father with the VR goggles on, supposedly all in a happy-family setting while the kids are doing one thing, and the wife another, all in the same room. And it just seems and looks goofy. We see that situation now with phones where families don't even talk to each other at the dinner table. They're all staring into the magical glass.
But perhaps that's an instance of the more things change, the more they stay the same. I read recently that during an English breakfast in Victorian times, it was normal for everyone to read his or her own choice of newspaper or book. This was the upper crust, supposedly. I don't remember if it mentioned what the lower classes were doing.
All this may be good or bad. VR may be completely harmless for playing a game or something. But this is pretty much the road we are heading down. So many people are right now substantially disconnected from reality via various means, especially their political and social beliefs. I can't imagine that VR will do much more than turn them into certifiable kooks. We'll see, though. This stuff is coming fast.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 20, 2024 20:01:39 GMT -8
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Oct 7, 2024 7:24:27 GMT -8
The following is a true story. The names have been changed to protect the innocent.
I was out biking/hiking/trail-clearing about a week ago. My Apple Watch, which I take on the hikes just to record basic data, has slowly been getting flakier and flakier. But I put up with it.
Well, on this day, it started doing something odd. It would set a timer itself (like an egg timer), and once it reached zero, it would beep. And the way this timer works, it beeps and beeps until you manually shut it off.
Okay, so I'm out on the trail doing work and my timer goes off. I thought, that's strange. But I take off my work gloves and fiddle with the timer app by hitting the really tiny button to turn off the alarm. No harm done.
But then 10 minutes later it does it again. I stop, take off my gloves, fiddle with the button, and turn it off again. I put back on my gloves and proceed with my work. Five minutes later, and for the third time, the timer goes off again. What keeps setting it? I don't know. But this time I've had enough. I simply power down the watch which requires more fiddling but it powers down and off.
And then maybe 10 minutes later the timers starts beeping again. What the heck? How can it do that when the watch itself is turned off? Well, somehow this Apple Watch from hell turned itself on again. I tore the watch off my wrist, flung it to the ground, and reached for a large rock to smash it. One wasn't immediately at hand and that's just how close this Apple Watch came to buying it right then and there. I kid you not.
My younger brother understands. His girlfriend at the time (now his wife) bought him an Apple Watch for his birthday a year ago. He almost never wears it. He says it's simply a "nagging device." And, of course, he's right. As I've used the watch over the years, and as they've "updated" the software, it got more and more naggy, the software flakier and flakier.
So on Saturday I'm out biking, hiking, and trail-clearing on a fairly remote trail. My watch band often comes loose (the Velcro fastener gets weaker when gunked up with gunk). I'll have to often cinch up the band. But because I'm wearing rather large work gloves, there no danger of it slipping completely off my wrist.
Or so I thought. I lost the watch on a specific fairly remote trail that day. I think it simply escaped. How it got off my wrist, I don't know. I searched the trail twice. I tried the "Find My" app on the phone. But it couldn't find it. I suspect this is because this watch will often turn off Bluetooth all on its own. And without Bluetooth, there's no way for the iPhone and the Watch to see each other.
Having declared defeat (which was sort of a victory in the long run), I then went through the procedure on my phone to report it as lost, which basically then locks it so no one else can do anything with it. You also enter your phone number and a message so that if anyone does find it, they can call you.
I had done my due diligence in trying to find it. But I was hardly disappointed. In some strange way, I felt free, free at last. And then to make things even stranger, a half hour after getting home, I get an automated message from Apple saying that the watch was found in Silverdale, ten miles away. I was on Green Mountain (miles from both Silverdale and home) when I lost it – on a fairly remote trail. Basically I've never seen anyone on that trail but the very occasional motorcycle, and no one on that particular day. In fact, there was no one out in the area when I was out there. I didn't pass a soul.
Suffice it to say, I will never, ever buy another Apple Watch.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Oct 7, 2024 13:24:43 GMT -8
The story highlights, among other points, the downside of the constantly changing (improving) of technology as well as the fact that we can all be tracked all day, everyday by those who control tech.
I am convinced the constant change is mainly pushed by marketing considerations. Back in the early 1990s, I knew someone in Computrac and during discussions it came out that they had a release schedule for new products planned out over more than two years in the future. Computrac already had the tech improvements to release new products immediately, but that was not part of their plan.
As to watches and smart phones, I use these as rebuttals to those who worry the powers that be are going to insert chips into our bodies so as to keep track of us. "Why would they?" I ask. Everyone caries the best tracking devices on their persons already. Even better, each individual pays for the privilege by purchasing the device and paying a monthly fee to carry it.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Oct 7, 2024 18:38:16 GMT -8
My Apple Watch was a 4 model. I think I got it in 2019. And some Mac/Apple people do hold onto their computers for a few years. But without a doubt, these companies absolutely depend on the upgrade cycle. They offer improvements, for sure. But they depend on a large number of people wanting the latest and the greatest whether the improvements are large or small. If you want a smart watch, Mr. Kung, check out this one. I will even buy it for you out of Apple-spite. But the reviews are generally pretty good. Certainly it's not likely to be as robust as more expensive watches. Buy for $35.00, few are going to be too concerned about that aspect. I'm half tempted to pick one up. But I ran that experiment already. Quite frankly, it was used mostly for keeping a grocery list, and I can do that easily enough (even easier) on my phone.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Oct 8, 2024 6:17:51 GMT -8
Thanks for the offer, but it would be a waste of money. Since I was a child I have disliked wearing things like belts, rings and watches. Even today, I will wear a watch when I go out, but once I get home I take it off. I can't imagine wearing a tracking device.
|
|