A.I.

Remember the sometimes blunt advice that Dear Abby or Ann Landers would hand out? The same with Dr. Phil. Most problems are not ironed out by blowing a never-ending stream of obsequious compliments up someone's butt.

Is AI ever going to tell a woman to lose weight? For a guy to stop sponging off his parents and get a job? That gets to the heart of it. AI has no standards other than a matrix of maternal, always-pleasing thoughts and ideas.

Personally, I wouldn't have posted that video without a few words of caution. I know on the face of it that it's just some kid talking about his toys. But see how easily that both are seduced by it?



More and more we'll live and work within our personalized space, free from anything that displeases us. It will all be positive-reinforcement, certainly aided and abetted by obsequious AI bots. What that means, in practice (as we already see happening), is that things are "equalized" in the downward direction. Standards are slackened. You're not unhealthily obese. You're "Plus Size".

The pervasive Kindergarten-like atmosphere of DEI will predominate. Rather than meeting challenging thoughts and ideas head-on (which is the only way to objectively improve), we will continue to deflect from any standard commonly known as competence or excellence and instead make excuses for incompetence.

At least on the bottom rungs. On the top rungs, the Lords of Tech and other Deep State Masters will be running and living another game, played by much different rules for themselves. And they will play to our personal narcissistic spaces (PNS's). We will (continue) to be told that if we feel emotions or are exposed to ideas that make us uncomfortable, then those outer sources must be deleted. That's very convenient for an agenda of control.

"Brad, you're crazy. You see all that in some kid talking about his toy?"

Yes, I do. But that kid is just one example. We have hundreds of examples already to draw from. And what no one commented on was the particularly maternal nature of that AI bot. Yes, the voice was female. But a male voice would have had the same shtick. It would have been centered on the Indulgent Comforting Non-Judgemental Female model.

But even as they knew as far back as 1953, they had to "Make Room for Daddy." But they're not. It's all female. It's the thing that only a few will say. And I make no value judgment on that, per se. As I've said, if you want to see the harm of an all-male orientation, see WWI or various similar wars.

It's not male or female, per se, that is the problem. The problem is twofold: The exclusion of one while the other is exaggerated to the point of pathology.

Oh my word. Isn't that the truth. The guy has a sinister look to him. If there are indeed people who sell their soul to the devil to gain earthly power and profit, he looks like one of them.

And H.G. Wells was remarkably prescient.

Musk is suing the bastards at OpenAI. And I just assume they are bastards because, 1), they lied about their mission statement and, 2) Microsoft is backing them and, 3), Sam Altman impresses me as sort of a creepy fellow.