|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 22, 2022 15:43:02 GMT -8
I believe I have seen this some years back. Of course, I have read the history around the ship, which is no doubt more interesting than the film.
One of the big questions of WWII is way Germany had so little success on the oceans, other than with their U-BOOTS?
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Aug 22, 2022 16:09:35 GMT -8
I was thinking about this too. The naval engagement with the Graf Spee was apparently the first surface-to-surface ship naval engagement of the war. And the British kicked their ass. Of course, it was three ships against one. But the larger and better-armed Graf Spee apparently had tremendous advantages in firepower. There is a sequence late in the movie where Captain Dove asks Captain Langsdorff what happened. (Dove was in a sort of luxury prison inside the Graf Spree while the battle commenced.) Landsdorff said that he thought the British cruisers (which were charging his ship) were trying to drive the Graf Spee into the arms of some British battleships. Well, there weren't any British battleships in the area. The aggressive tactics of the British cost them one beat-up ship (which may have limped back to the Falklands...we never find out). But otherwise they got in some killing shots on the Graf Spree. The British also used a plane and battle tactics (ships coming at the Graf Spee from both sides) to help spot each other's shots to see if they were over-shooting or under-shooting. That seemed to play a part. And it's highly probably, although unstated in the movie, that the British gunners were better and fired faster. We know that was typically the case for the old wooden sailing vessels. Other nations had ships just as big, if not bigger. But no one could fire them as fast or as accurately as the British. I'm assuming in terms of the big picture, the British simply had far more ships than the Germans did. But even if they were more equal, I'm going to assume that British tactics and experience would have given then a real edge. It would be interesting to read more about this. I also think that the German captains were very fearful of doing damage to their big ships which were vital propaganda tokens (if not quite militarily as useful) for the Nazis. So they played it safe maybe?
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Aug 23, 2022 20:31:04 GMT -8
Here's one on ScreenPix you can bypass: The Steel Lady. I wanted to like this. Oil prospectors, scanning the Sahara with some newfangled equipment hanging from the bottom of their plane, hit a Sirocco and are forced to land. The engines and radio are both out and they don't have a lot of supplies. Luckily they find a buried Kraut tank from WWII. And it still works! But Bedouins are after them because the Germans who owned this tank stole some jewels from them. And they think that now these Americans have the jewels. Flat characters, predictable plot, and nothing making a whole lot of sense all combine to topple would could have been an interesting drama. Just a general artlessness pervades this one. And none of the characters (even the villains) are compelling.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Aug 25, 2022 20:17:57 GMT -8
Flight to Hong KongThis 1956 Noir/Crime film, set in Hong Kong and Macao, I think would have been Kung-approved until it got to the last 12 minutes. They either didn't know what the film was about or they just botched it. But until those last 12 minutes, I found it interesting. Rory Calhoun plays a high-style crook working for some worldwide crime syndicate (which includes Colonel Klink as a man high in the hierarchy). While flying on a plane (as part of a team smuggling diamonds), Tony Dumont (Calhoun) runs into a novelist, Pamela Vincent, who is played by Barbara boom-boom Rush. But Dumont already has a blond stashed back on Macao (played by Dolores Donlon). But he's a crook so ethics smethics. It's a difficult role. Calhoun is a crook (astonishingly cold-blooded at times). But he's also a suave babe magnet. He skirts the line between being likable and hoping he gets killed in some nasty way. There are exotic settings. It's visually pleasing and moves along quite well for most of it. It's just too bad the ending made not much sense.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 26, 2022 9:49:46 GMT -8
I know diamonds are forever, but the chicks would have been worth more to me.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Aug 26, 2022 12:44:43 GMT -8
The blond was nice. And I very much like Barbara Boom-Boom Rush. She's been in her share of b-movies, particularlly sci-fi, going by this list. And she played in Come Blow Your Horn with Frank. I don't know if I've seen that. But whatever she's been in, she's always boom-boomed.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Aug 28, 2022 14:19:03 GMT -8
Here's another one with Rory Calhoun: The Big CaperFrank Harper (Calhoun) has quickly blown at the racetrack the bucks he made on his last caper. He sees an opportunity to knock over a bank for a government payroll worth a million dollars. He brings his proposal to boss-man Flood (James Gregory). Gregory went to prison once doing a bank job and swore to stick to lower-risk larceny. He knows that bank jobs are a whole other realm of risk. He turns Harper down but Harper's persistence (and perhaps the natural greed of a criminal) eventually win Flood over. What can go wrong? Everything. This movie is fully of wonderfully cliched and overblown characters, including Flood's dirty-work man, the creepy Roy...played interestingly by Corey Allen. And then there's "Doll," the dumb-blonde attached to one of the heist men who learns too much about their plans and becomes a potential danger. But everything connected to this job is ready-made to blow up in their face. The guy who is supposed to set off a lot of bombs as a diversion (Zimmer) is a drunk pyromaniac totally out of control. It's really a comedy of errors. I don't think they were going for funny. But they often achieved it. An interesting (and odd) element is Frank Harper buying a gas station across from the bank they are going to knock off. He pretends to be husband-and-wife with Flood's girl, Kay (Mary Costa). Costa easily gives the best and most complex performance. But there's no apparent reason why they need this charade to knock over the bank. After having pretended to be a middle-class husband-and-wife for several months, Kay begins to love the life beyond crime. She likes the normalcy of neighborhoods, barbecues, and staying in one place. For a moment the film plays with this dynamic and flirts with being something deeper than a b-movie. But ultimately it's just a passing fancy. This is a shame because the breakdown of the heist is inevitable, obvious, and not at all interesting when it happens. The viewer isn't left with much at the end of this. But if you like heist films, give this one a watch. It's outrageously bizarre at times. But until the very end, generally it is quite interesting. It should also be noted that Calhoun will never replace Humphrey Bogart. Bogart had a way of playing a bad guy without losing his appeal. But Calhoun is a bit of a stiff and can only ever flirt with sociopathy in terms of adding any depth to his character.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 28, 2022 20:02:03 GMT -8
Since I don't watch so many films, I think will have to put this one low on my waiting list.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Aug 29, 2022 7:23:36 GMT -8
It's worth watching just to see Creepy Roy. He's like some psychotic version of The Beach Boys. And "Doll" is so boom-boom dumb that you can't help but like her. Or despise her with warm feelings.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 29, 2022 10:38:09 GMT -8
From the photo, I would say it looks worth watching just to see Boom-Boom.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Aug 31, 2022 9:02:58 GMT -8
Crime of PassionKathy Doyle (Barbara Stanwyck) is a hard-bitten reporter/gossip columnist. She is moving on to a bigger job in New York. But in the meantime she meets a homicide detective, Bill Doyle (Sterling Hayden). They are instantly smitten with each other. She junks the job in New York, they get hitched, and she moves in with him in his house in LA. The synopsis declares succinctly: "[she] is frustrated by his lack of ambition and the banality of life in the suburbs. Her drive to advance Bill's career soon takes her down a dangerous path.This is all well and good as a plot. The problem is, they make some leaps without building much of a foundation. Yes, people can be impulsive. Yes, people do meet and get married before really knowing each other. But the hard-bitten, career-oriented Kathy instantly terns into Miss Domestic Wanna-Please-My-Man. It's not at all convincing even if well-acted. The script takes too many shortcuts to make much of the movie believable. But it's a strong cast that also includes Raymond Burr as Bill's boss. This review nails if if you want to learn more. But the sheer bizarreness of this hard-charging story makes it interesting to watch. Just don't expect subtlety.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Sept 8, 2022 8:59:09 GMT -8
I watched 1974's Juggernaut yesterday. It stars Richard Harris as a bomb-defusing specialist. His team is called in to help defuse the bombs that someone has smuggled onboard a cruise ship, captained by Omar Sharif (who is bland and unimportant in this movie, as is Anthony Hopkins). The bomber wants $500,000 or he'll blow up the ship. It's a cheesy, made-for-TV type of movie, although I'm not sure if this was actually made for TV. It's amateurish and comical in such elements as the trying-too-hard cruise entertainment director played by Roy Kinnear. His performance is surely exactly what they wanted. But it's cringe-worthy all the same. Indeed, that is probably the point of it. In the end, Richard Harris brings a focus and intensity to the movie that otherwise is lacking. And I must have seen a different movie from the guy at IMDB who wrote, " This big-budgeted disaster movie was professional and expertly directed by Richard Lester." This has Irwin Allen wanna-be written all over it. And it can be enjoyed on that basis as a disaster film – minus any reason to care for any of the passengers. Most of the supporting characters are dead-end in terms of interest. The focus is on Harris and his team. And there is a good performance by the ship owner (played by Ian Holm) who anchors the movie until the defusing ball gets rolling. You'll also see a couple bond stars in this, including Julian Glover (Kristataos, For Your Eyes Only) and Clifton James (Sheriff J.W. Pepper, Live and Let Die, The Man with the Golden Gun). But none of these interesting actors, other than Harris and Holm, have a part that is noteworthy -- with the possible exception of the villain...about whom I'll say nothing more.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Sept 11, 2022 6:52:34 GMT -8
Here's one you don't need to watch. And it's one I didn't finished: Billion Dollar Brain. It's a spy thriller with some subtle spoofing of the genre. In fact, the opening credits are creative and fantastic...and a nice take-off on the Bond type. But eventually about halfway through the film (which definitely has signs of going nowhere), we run into the rich, mad anti-Communist Texan, extremely over-acted by Ed Begley. Even without this theme, the movie was going rotten. But throw in the theme that conservative anti-communists are all kooks and you've totally lost me. It did start off with some subtle potential. But it doesn't take long until you'll be asking yourself the same question: Why did they make this film? How did it ever get through the approval process? And how in the world did they get Michael Caine to appear in it? As to why this movie was made, it was obviously a piece of liberal porn. One reviewer gives some views and perspective:
|
|