Trust the Science

I ran across this just now. 

Largest Cosmic Explosion   

While the new discovery is interesting, I found what Dr. Wiseman said to be astounding. 

"in science, there's never certainty." 

He had better watch his back. Telling the truth these days will get you into trouble with those who say, "trust the science." 

I haven't watched this video. I started it but went into "skim" mode when it seemed to be anything but concise.



So the next level of skimming was the comments where I ran across this one:



"Pursuit of imaginary equations." And if something didn't fit it would be "normalized" (sort of what is done to people who don't believe there are more than two sexes).

"To me they were just playing with formulas." Sounds a lot like "gender reassignment surgery" for scientific research. "Having no grounding in real physics." Thus was birthed the "multiverse," string theory, and other completely fictional concoctions. The real world be damned. We like the math!

To be fair, as Timothy would remind us, pursuing mathematical consistency has lead to the discovery of particles that "had to be there" according to The Standard Model.

If I use fancy words, don't mistake that for actually understanding this. And yet, you and I are not apparently much different from the basic scientific researchers these days. We might even be more worthy for we are not making stuff up.

It could be that we've discovered most of what is discoverable and that all that is left is details. It could be that the weirdness of quantum physics (which seems to govern the smallest levels) has left researchers ontologically decapitated. Quantum physics seems to suggest that at the deepest levels (deepest materialist levels, that is) that there is no real rhyme nor reason to anything.

Maybe that has left scientists in a tizzy. Combined with atheism and postmodern thought, they may actually be intellectually, emotionally, and creatively all but incapable of discovering the Next Big Thing.

I sort of had an inkling of this over the last thirty years via observing a few articles and reading various pop-science books. It just seemed like the blind leading the blind. Put it another way: If atheist materialists of a "nothing really need make sense" postmodernist approach are not making any gains, maybe that tells you something about where the gains may be had, about the general nature of where the Next Big Thing lies.

Maybe Intelligent Design, for instance, is not too kooky. But there are entire areas of research written off by Establishment Science because it doesn't conform to their way of How Things Should Be. Let's hope the floodgates open. There should be some interesting surprises in store.

Should have consulted me, although I have two at the most these days.



This is because women are prone to hysteria and love their drama. All this stuff is marketed to them.

Sounds as if Amanda has looked behind the curtain and perhaps become a little less prone to hysteria. But I wouldn't bet the farm on that.

Yep. Or close enough...

As if one needed further proof that what passes for the "science" of psychology in America is a complete sham and such associations as The American Psychological Association are nothing more than left-wing-political committees.

Hiring the best is bad

More damning information on what passes for scholarly work in business academia. Interestingly, this particular cesspit deals with females who have falsified information in numerous studies.

It's harder for women to make it in the world, so we lie