kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,470
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 15, 2019 11:21:45 GMT -8
he equivalent of the software giving him the finger.
As I think I have mentioned before, I see computers as just another tool, at times a very frustrating tool, but still a tool. In McCormick's situation, I believe I would have called upon another tool, thus saving my shin. That tool would be a hammer.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,470
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 15, 2019 11:24:14 GMT -8
Is it that you like cleaning up other people's messes or you just can stand messes thus are compelled to clean them up?
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Aug 15, 2019 11:26:19 GMT -8
I doubt we had any hammers available. Those would be intended for hardware problems, and we were programmers. ("How many computer programmers does it take to change a lightbulb?" "That's a hardware problem!") Besides, we were on-site so that may have been the customer's computer -- and if not, it would have been an office computer. Either way, using a hammer would have deleterious long-term consequences.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,470
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 15, 2019 12:13:13 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Aug 15, 2019 12:31:11 GMT -8
An interesting article, which I commented on at Town Hall. Of course, we already knew that his views were a mix of left and right features due to his ZPG inclinations. This would fit in well with fascism, which was intended as an alternative to liberalism, conservatism, and socialism combining elements of both left and right. The term national socialism made that especially clear. One historian (I don't recall who) noted that even National Socialism was decisively defeated in World War II, national socialism arguably won.
And we see it in America today, with the left strongly linked to it -- much more so than conservatives.
And one can't forget that the Demagogues have always been the party of racial division, though they've changed where they put the different races in their hierarchy.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,239
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Aug 15, 2019 13:54:00 GMT -8
Inanimate objects can sometimes fight back. No question about it.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Aug 15, 2019 15:18:33 GMT -8
Isn't that the whole point of AI? Demon Seed (James Schmitz's Demon Breed is a very different book despite its similar title, and the sort of book John W. Campbell, Jr. would love; Nile Etland might be my favorite female heroine) and Terminator and all that. All hail Skynet!
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,239
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Aug 15, 2019 19:28:02 GMT -8
Hahahaha. Good point. Without that, we would have missed a lot of good movies.
There once was a robotic sky grid With mega-smarts under its lid The humans, so puny Their goals, oh so loony Sacked the carbon-based units, they did
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,470
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 25, 2019 13:13:34 GMT -8
The link is to another fine article from Takimag. This one points out the dishonest of the New York Times' later project 1619, which is trying to bamboozle the ignorant of this country, by claiming America started in 1619 with the sale of the first slave to someone on the Eastern Seaboard.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Aug 25, 2019 13:46:43 GMT -8
Very interesting. Of course, slavery already existed in the Americas in 1619 -- in colonies further south. This probably included Florida and New Mexico, both of which had been settled by then (and possibly Texas and Louisiana, too), albeit sparsely. And those first black slaves were actual indentured servants, just as many whites were. But who -- at the New Barackum Slimes, anyway -- cares about such minor details?
One might also note that slaves played only minor roles in many northern states (though New York and New Jersey had a fair number), and even Georgia initially banned slavery there. I wonder if any leftists are aware that the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 banned slavery in an area that ended up forming 5 states (and part of a sixth). I also wonder if they're aware that many Indian tribes, especially in the South, kept slaves of their own, which has a lot to do why the Five Civilized Tribes initially allied with the CSA. Indeed, the remaining Confederate Indians didn't surrender until nearly a month after Edmund Kirby Smith surrended the Transmississippi forces. (At that point, the only unsurrendered Confederate force was the cruiser Shenandoah, hunting down whales in the Bering Sea.)
But as any leftist worth her salt would say: Details, details.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,470
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 26, 2019 12:15:55 GMT -8
The link will take the reader to an article at NRO which shows what shoddy "history" the New York Slimes has based its "1619" project on.
As is usually the case, leftists are either stupid or dishonest in their political claims. In this case, I would bet a lot of money on them being both.
NRO is still, occasionally, able to publish something that is rational, fact-based and contributes to to traditional conservative thinking and truth. What a surprise.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Aug 26, 2019 12:31:54 GMT -8
An interesting article. NRO generally remains good in its historical articles. Note that although cotton was the main US antebellum export, there was a lot of internal trade in foodstuffs. Confederate pork supplies for the first couple of years relied heavily on pigs and pork imported from the Midwest in 1861, and US grain exports from the same area (which normally would have gone to the South) helped feed England during the same period.
If cotton were as important as the leftist historians claim, then US railroad lines would have reflected this -- sending cotton from the deep South to the northern cotton mills. There would have been a lot fewer lines in the Midwest than there actually were. Rolling stock would also have reflected this, and again it didn't -- Southern lines generally had a lot less rolling stock than northern ones.
By 1861, heavy industry was already very important, relying heavily on Minnesota iron and Pennsylvania coal. Cotton had nothing to do with that.
|
|