Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Feb 13, 2020 13:53:49 GMT -8
Are you saying that just because one might “tolerate” homosexuality in a live-and-let-live sort of way that we still don’t necessarily want our president to look like this:  or this:  |
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Feb 13, 2020 14:14:43 GMT -8
Bolshie Bernie would probably make a more authentic American president than those clowns. Battygeek, on the other hand . . . But I guess that's your point, after all.
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Feb 13, 2020 14:27:44 GMT -8
One wonders what mental problems compel these unfortunate individuals to act in such a manner. This is one of the main problems with libertarianism, it can and often does promote the manifestation of mental illness as opposed to trying to cure it.
Prancing pervert pricks should be best kept under medical care.
|
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Feb 13, 2020 14:34:36 GMT -8
Putin would make a more authentic American president than any of these Democrat candidates.
I tried to find a good argument for this, but alas, I can't. |
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Feb 13, 2020 14:38:52 GMT -8
Are you saying that just because one might “tolerate” homosexuality in a live-and-let-live sort of way that we still don’t necessarily want our president to look like this: Yes, nor would any other sane country. Try to imagine Vlad or Xi even the ruler of the most obscure country dressed the same. |
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Feb 13, 2020 18:33:28 GMT -8
I think our culture is full of these little niches now where being as outrageous and provocative as you can (in relationship to anything considered traditional) becomes sort of a performance-art sport.
99.99% of liberals who say they support this kind of stuff wouldn’t be caught dead in that balloon outfit. I think it’s analogous to the compromise in that sketch from Monty Python’s “Life of Brian.” I think it’s Michael Palin who finally says that they can support the idea that Loretta (Stan) has a right to have babies even if she (he) can’t actually have babies. You cater to the madness and figure no harm done.
Supporting these free spirits (even if inwardly they give you the willies) is a sign of how tolerant, hip, and open-minded you are. And these balloon-men guys and others surely on some level know this gives them a license to be as weird as they want, especially if they get token praise for it.
I can pretty much guarantee you that it is not a natural urge to wear a dog collar or a train of multi-colored balloons. But once one has committed to go down the road of weird, you might as well go whole-hog.
And I think there is some kind of weirdo feedback loop that kicks in. The weirder the stuff you do, the more it acclimates you to weirdness. It’s all about drowning out that little voice inside that is screaming, WHAT THE HELL AM I DOING IN A GAY PARADE WEARING ALL THESE BALLOONS?
|
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Feb 13, 2020 19:14:34 GMT -8
It was Judith who came up with the compromise in Life of Brian. Reg pointed out that Stan (Loretta) couldn't have babies, at which Stan responded "Don't you oppress me." So Reg asked him where the fetus would gestate as a way of explaining why he couldn't have babies. Then Judith suggested they agree that while Stan was unable to have babies ("which is no one's fault, not even the Romans"), he could have the right to have babies. She said it was a symbol of their struggle against oppression, to which Reg muttered that it was a symbol of Stan's struggle with reality.
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Feb 14, 2020 15:08:22 GMT -8
Butt-gig and his "spouse" might consider starting a family while in the White House (If he wins)
Spread the word. I am sure most Americans will wait in rapture for the arrival of the future perv.
The Liberty Daily calls Butt-gig, Buttplug which sounds authentic.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Feb 14, 2020 15:33:56 GMT -8
Without even reading the article, I’m wondering how that is biologically possible.
Well, yeah. I guess so.
I couldn’t have been the interviewer and kept a straight face. No pun intended about the “straight face.”
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Feb 14, 2020 15:35:05 GMT -8
Thanks for the laugh of the day. One commenter succinctly writes:
And this other guy is spot-on:
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Feb 14, 2020 15:43:11 GMT -8
I suspect that is the feeling of a large majority of people. It is why I want to spread around this article.
As to his living in that delusion, I do think the man needs mental-health care.
|
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Feb 14, 2020 16:10:04 GMT -8
Is Battygeek's "spouse" named either Stan or Loretta? I once read a horror story involving a pregnant man, but it was revenge by a witch he had mistreated. She got pregnant by him, then did a spell that somehow implanted the fetus in him. She didn't give him a vagina, so he would need a C-section.
Presumably, the Battygeeks will do this by adoption. Or maybe the obstetrician in Pillow Talk was just ahead of his time.
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Feb 21, 2020 10:23:28 GMT -8
This is an example of why I went from basically neutral on queers to an outspoken harsh critic. Polygamy is properOf course, this is happening in Utah, the province of Mormanism. It would seem, they still want to take advantage of multiple maidens prancing in a row. Once they get this, then everyone else will have to pay for their many families, as I understand that welfare is a major means of support for those who already practice this rite without registering their marriages. Once polygamy is ok'd the wreckers will demand marriage to animals is a "right." |
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Feb 21, 2020 10:38:17 GMT -8
Conservatives like us predicted this at the time, and libertinists and libertarians said no, and as usual we were right. We see the same thing with Phyllis Schlafly's fears for what the ERA would bring (and which state ERAs have brought). Slippery slopes (aka the Overton Window) do exist.
As to whether bestiality or pedophilia is the next barrier to fall, we'll see. There's more of an active movement for the latter (e.g., NAMBLA, whose parades Demagogues such as Botox Nan attend).
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Feb 21, 2020 11:12:00 GMT -8
This quote is from an article in the February 2020 edition of "The New Criterion." The article is titled, "Gertrude Himmelfarb & the Englightenment," by Keith Windschuttle.
Himmelfarb was the mother of Bill Kristol, that die-hard Never-Trumper.
The modernist project is decades old. Taking hold of the language is part of its tool chest. Old-school histories called that period which stretched from about the middle 17th century to the end of the 18th century "The Age of Reason." The leftists subtly changed this to "The Enlightenment."
One quote from the above mentioned article states things very clearly.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Feb 21, 2020 12:37:36 GMT -8
Straight talk is so rare, it’s worth pointing out. Silvio Canto Jr. writes regarding last night’s debate: |
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Feb 21, 2020 14:18:29 GMT -8
It hit me a couple of days ago, that Mayor Pete is 2020's Obamanation except he is a queer, not black. If you will recall, the Obamanation had the same M.O. i.e. spout nothing in a seemingly articulate manner. Such things impress too many Dimwits, particularly when connected with some minority or other.
|
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Feb 21, 2020 14:41:29 GMT -8
Of course, this is happening in Utah, the province of Mormanism I spent four years in Mormaina. Lived in a 75% LDS community, Layton, I had LDS on all sides and a church almost in my back yard. None of these Mormans would condone polygamy. Those I knew were very opposed to the practice. However, in Salt Lake City that was a different matter. SL City and County composes the largest population of non Mormons in the state, approximately 50% of the population is not LDS and a significant percentage of those are liberal/progressive democrats, always the loudest segment. I admit I have numerous, significant differences with LDS on many issues and generally consider the religion to be at best deceptive and at worst a colossal fraud. However, it is my belief that most LDS consider polygamy to be a deviance from accepted norms and those who want to make it legal again are mostly transplants from the pits of San Francisco, Chicago and New York. Yes, there are polygamous families in Utah. They are anathema to mainstream LDS. My guess is that there are also polygamous families in Seattle, Dallas, Nashville, and Arkansas and they are not LDS but more likely some form of Christiaan. What angers me is not the marriage or non-marriage but the willingness of some of these groups to suck off the public trough to support their lifestyle. As long as they stay self supporting I don't care if they are polygamous, polyandry group or line marriage. Just don't expect me to provide financial support. |
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Feb 21, 2020 15:12:40 GMT -8
Hug your wife for me…and for yourself. It’s a bizarre, topsy-turvy and morally polluted world out there. Cherish the good things. I’m sure you do. Unless it’s a Russian bride or something like that, what man in his right mind would want one progressive woman, let alone two or three? I don’t get it. And interesting point that it may be displaced progressives moving into Utah who may be the impetus for polygamy. No wonder (I quip) transgenderism is looking good to some. Wacky, in so many areas of life, has become normal. By the way, there’s a show on the Real Truth channel about a supposedly famous transgender couple. He (she) looks like a dude and she (yikes!) looks good as a girl. I’m confused already. But I watched about 15 minutes of it just to take a walk on the wild side. I’m curious as to how much of this is cultural and how much is innate. It’s hard to say. My guess would be 90% cultural and 10% innate. Even that is possibly deceptive, for those who we used to call “tomboys” and preferred not to ride side-saddle, probably mostly went on to be perfectly normal women. But now that you have a yuge online community offering choices and telling people that it’s normal to be a guy stuck in a girl’s body (or vice versa), it muddles the question of what is innate and what is not. One reason I turned off this transgender documentary was I couldn’t stand all the complaining (especially by the men-pretending-to-be-women) that it was hard to find a guy. Well, unless you tell them beforehand that you have male equipment, you’re going to turn off a lot of people. And those whom you turn on are probably not Better Homes & Gardens boyfriend (girlfriend?) material. And then you see these girls doping themselves with testosterone and that leaves not doubt that this isn’t good. Oh, here's a public relations photo (in practice) showing just how supposedly normal this is. These were the two featured in the fauxumentary that I saw part of: Like I say...if you were on a desert island and there was no one else . . . oh, we really shouldn't go there. |
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Feb 21, 2020 15:20:34 GMT -8
The similarity between Battygeek and the Black God has been noticed, and in fact is no doubt deliberate. I'm sure he figures that what worked in 2008 can work again.
|
|
