|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Sept 5, 2020 15:39:43 GMT -8
I believe Biden is today's Pope Paul VI for the Democratic Bolshevik Party. A sleepy old man who is not all there and will let things slide as long as people don't bother him too much. "Sign here Joe," said Satan. And Joe scratched his name on the dotted line.
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Sept 5, 2020 21:22:25 GMT -8
The world is turned upside down. If any proof was needed simply note that, our elites have closed down the world because of the spread of a virus which is less deadly that the flu for anyone under 70. They have done this under the guise of "public health."
Yet they have allowed and even positively promoted mass insanity and the rejection of reality with the ridiculous claims of 57 different genders and the like.
It appears we will develop a vaccine for the KFF, but the cure for the satanic viciousness which ails our political discourse will likely need to be made of very strong stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Sept 6, 2020 6:19:50 GMT -8
This is even worse than I thought. Back in the 80s, I read about the Yonkers scattered-site housing case in National Review, and it had a major effect on my political philosophy. To me, the story was an arrogant judge who imposed his ukase on a middle-class city that had segregated housing because they accepted federal subsidized housing for poor blacks in the 50s. Meanwhile, no such effort would be imposed by anyone on the judge's lily-white gated community.
In other words, this was an example of self-righteous rich liberals imposing rules on the poor and middle class that had little or no effect on them. This was especially clear in fighting crime.
But in this, not only do these vicious rich leftists see themselves as immune to the consequences of their policies, but in fact they plan to profiteer from them at the expense of the lesser orders -- including the very people on behalf of whom they claim to support (and often participate in) rioting.
It's worth believing in Hell to have a suitable place for them. Ninth circle, anyone?
Incidentally, my friend's "book club", which consists of free e-books from him and another friend, included In Defense of Looting yesterday, no doubt on the basis of "know your enemy" (my father had a small collection of Communist writings on that basis). It perhaps says something that though I read "The Communist Manifesto" back then, I don't plan to read this now.
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Oct 12, 2020 16:41:27 GMT -8
You will not believe this. How does a state agency in Idaho become infiltrated with the radical queer philosophy? Unless a couple bows down to the LBGTQRSTUVWXYZ Satanists, they cannot adopt their own flesh and blood? State tyranny on religious belief |
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Oct 12, 2020 17:04:12 GMT -8
At least a judge rectified the Behemoth misdeed (it wasn't an error, it was quite deliberately bigoted). The GOP runs Idaho, so they should get to work cleaning out this agency -- and I wouldn't be surprised if there are a few more who need to be scrubbed of leftist activists.
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Oct 16, 2020 19:32:47 GMT -8
This is Biden's top priority if elected? Perversion is obligatoryWhat fools still believe that the faggot/lesbian/pedo brigade are not behind a push to destroy the USA? There will be blood. |
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Oct 16, 2020 20:39:04 GMT -8
I doubt it's the Yellow Jester's priority, and it's also unlikely to be Camelface Harris's. But the leftist avant garde wants it on behalf of the alphabet soupers, and they won't say no.
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Oct 21, 2020 7:15:52 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Oct 21, 2020 7:58:00 GMT -8
I saw that, and reacted much the same way. Civil unions may be a good policy, or they would be if the militant homosexual lobby would accept that compromise (which they never did -- in fact, they used it to claim discrimination because of the minimal difference between civil unions and marriage). But it violates various Catholic moral doctrines -- or did before the Peron Anti-Pope took over the hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Nov 16, 2020 15:51:18 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Nov 21, 2020 7:33:31 GMT -8
An ad-blocker came up on my computer when I opened this page, but I can still read part of the page. That's enough to see good news. Don't Mess With TexasStill sane down here. |
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Dec 17, 2020 6:43:30 GMT -8
Little Hungary is one of the few nations which appears not to have suffered mass psychosis. Orban needs all the support he can get.
|
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Dec 17, 2020 7:04:36 GMT -8
Much better than enshrining abnormality into the law, as most of the West has done.
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Dec 30, 2020 21:46:56 GMT -8
The advantage the left has is that it is impossible to argue with insanity. Yet, "reasonable" people on the right continue to try. Real men date transgender men/womenThe correct response to such garbage is "you need to see a doctor, sicko." Don't even try to engage with those who try to spread this type of thing. |
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Jan 9, 2021 21:27:25 GMT -8
The National Association of Realtors has made "hate speech" a fireable offense. This includes things said at home or elsewhere even out of the office. We will crush youIt should be noted that as of 2017, the majority of real estate agents (63%) were white females, the typical one being 53 years old. Also note, one of the agents in this interview was a lesbian who was all for the ban. Can you guess who is pushing this agenda? Old, touchy white lesbians, maybe? |
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jan 10, 2021 11:44:12 GMT -8
I was awful at it (in my own opinion), but I actually designed the advertising campaign for the Washington Association of Realtors® way back when. Trump’s misadventure at the Capitol has helped unleash this stuff. I’ll grant you they were already looking for any old excuse — not to mention already implementing this all across society even before the storming of the Bastille. But Trump did us no favors. If it was difficult to make the case for free speech to the Nervous Karens and Soy-Boy Bills before and it’s even tougher now. We definitely do not want a society run according to whatever offends touchy white lesbians. One of my friends who lives just down the block is a white, fairly conservative, Catholic Realtor®. I’ll pick her brain on this next time I see her. Something applies regarding this whole Trump presidency and the ending debacle. My thought is the old adage “When you strike at the king, you must kill him.” For all of Trump’s off-color or just plain reasonably bold Tweets and statements, he never gave a prolonged and clear rational for free speech. He’d just Tweet something rude, tell everyone he hated political correctness, and then move on. Thus there was nothing to learn from this other than Trump’s brash personality. He never killed the idea of political correctness or “woke” culture. And to a certain extent, that’s fine. Merely exercising the free speech muscle and getting in the face of the speech police is useful. I’m not against that. I’m sure I’m in agreement with all here that ridicule is one of the best political tools we have. But one reason (mostly after the fact, I admit) I like Reagan is that he not only acted but always had (or left a breadcrumb trail to) a rationale for his actions. It was never just “Because I’m brash enough to say so.” You can actually go back and read some of Reagan’s words in “ Reagan: In His Own Hand.” What astonishes me is that he found a balance between the vacuous say-nothing brevity of Tweets and the lost-in-the-brambles run-on length of so many of today’s “intellectual” conservatives. He had a clear foundation. Trump never did. I think even his tilts toward red-white-and-blue nationalism was just a means for his own self-glorification. As it turns out. Like I said, I do think the whole Capitol fiasco was a defining and clarifying moment. Why is it important to give good and clear reasons and some foundational rationale? Because otherwise all you get is an ill-formed mob where emotion rules. |
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Jan 11, 2021 9:25:52 GMT -8
I remember our discussions of same-sex "marriage" at ST. At the time, I was sure that the divorce lawyers would be developing a new cash stream. They have.
But the main point to be learned from this piece is,
As one would expect, we are dealing with lesbians here. Is there any question that there are some deep psychological problems involved?
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jan 11, 2021 12:09:29 GMT -8
Yes indeed.
And I think it’s important for more people to realize (not us here...we already know) that a great deal of new laws and policies are codified in order to cure in law things which are personal emotional or psychological issues.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jan 11, 2021 14:15:06 GMT -8
Let’s be honest, a woman without a man is like an angst-fueled rocket without a limiter switch.
You put two women in a “marriage” and you’re not just asking for trouble, you’re going to get it.
Also, it is my view that a significant number of “lesbians” are simply man-haters. And whether you marry another woman or your cat, that’s not going to solve your most basic problem which is that you’ve jettisoned your most basic attribute (womanhood) to satisfy your grievance.
If you marry either your politics or your anger, don’t be surprised if you’re not happy.
|
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Jan 11, 2021 14:17:59 GMT -8
From what I can see, most male homosexuals really are that way, whereas a large percentage of lesbians just hate men and choose lesbianism as a result.
|
|
