Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 13, 2019 8:58:22 GMT -8
I watched the first episode (the only one in existence so far) of the new Disney+ original Star War series, The Mandalorian. Ignore the 9.2 rating by the Moron Culture. J.J. Abrams could crap out a turd and fanboys would be gathering around giving it a 9.2…or higher. But (thank god) J.J. Abrams has nothing to do with this series. And although the plague-of-locusts-on-the-Star-Wars-franchise Kathleen Kennedy is listed as an executive producer, it’s clear her juvenile and PC tastes had little effect on this series (so far). Or, if they did, it shows she can learn. The first 15 minutes of this 40-minute episode was little more than a patched-together pastiche of Star Wars things. This did not look promising, for what did some of the awful recent movies do but simply repeat earlier movies? But then it started to tell a story. I was ready to turn this off as just more yute-culture junk (which it could still turn out to be). But time passed. No girl-power (as yet) thrown in our face. There was even some darker, grittier movements. Sure, there was some stupid droid humor which writers can’t seem to resist. But it wasn’t too much. The basic story is around a bounty hunter called “The Mandalorian.” He comes from a clan who have seen better days. This series is set after the fall of the empire. His last load of bounty captures doesn’t pay as well as he thought they would. And his bounty broker doesn’t have any more high-paying prospects on the horizon. Oh….but there is this one job you could do. It has to be sort of clandestine and off-the-books. The Mandalorian jumps at the chance and then is off. And I won’t tell you much more (unless you want to know). But at the end of this episode you can see how the story arc will immediately extend from there.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 18, 2019 17:21:02 GMT -8
I just watched the second episode of “The Mandalorian.” Oddly, it didn’t suck. It didn’t look like it was written and directed by a maturity-stunted 13-year-old trapped inside the body of a 20-something.
As you know, that’s probably as high of a compliment as I can give anything modern. The Mandalorian himself is a bounty hunter. His accouterments make him out to be a Predator-like being. He’s got a quite robust suit of armor with a few gadgets embedded into that suit.
His most redeeming quality thus far is that he doesn’t like Jawas. This is definitely not the kind of garbage that the 10-year-olds loved when George Lucas temporarily went insane and invented Jar Jar Binks. In one scene, the Mandalorian comes across some Jawas and their sandcrawler. He immediately takes his sniper rifle and starts picking off a few of them. We can only hope he makes his way to the Ewok forest and does a few of them as well.
The basics of directing are solid. There isn’t a bunch of stupid jumping around with the camera as some artless directors do trying to substitute motion for a plot. The basics seem pretty solid. Like the story or hate the story, director Dave Filoni (episode one) and Director Rick Famuyiwa (episode two) do not come from the Directorial School of Schmucks and Talentless Dumb-asses.
I know. From me, that is high praise indeed. Imagine watching anything on TV that isn’t infected by the kind of hyperkinetic directorial nonsense so common from the Juvenile Crowd. My only beef with episode two is the rather lame recreation of one of the moments from the first Indiana Jones film where he jumped onto a moving tank from his horse, falls to the side of the tank, and then is threatened to be crushed between the tank and the canyon wall. They recreate that with the Jawa sandcrawler with The Mandalorian jumping on it and trying to get in. Call it an homage, I guess. But it was unimaginative and somewhat came across as a cheap knock-off.
For some reason, I got it into my head that they would be releasing new episodes once a month. Maybe I read that somewhere. But the schedule is to be one per week for this first season of however many episodes that may be.
In this second episode, “The Child,” the Mandalorian is transporting the child back to get his reward. But he runs into a few complications, including the Jawas. This second episode was rather brief at 33 minutes. But it’s much smarter to be brief than to make the ubiquitous error of trying to pad things as most of even the good series do.
Jon Favreau (never heard of him) is the mastermind behind The Mandalorian. It’s easy to see that (so far, at least) he’s a traditional Star Wars fan. Oh, I wholly expect that he’ll eventually insert a bunch of stupid “girl power” stuff or bludgeon us over the head with cute droids. But so far the series has balls. This is the opposite to the prequel which lacked any kind of balls after the opening sequence of The Phantom Menace with Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan boarding the Trade Federation ship. And that was all of about 15 minutes and the rest of the prequel could be flushed down the toilet.
George Lucas may be listed as executive producer (or whatever), but clearly his degenerative influence has not tainted this latest effort. We can assume therefore that he is merely a figurehead.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 24, 2019 20:34:09 GMT -8
I thought the third episode of The Mandalorian dropped off a bit. Still, it wasn’t silly. And my brother showed me an article about some screeching feminist who didn’t like it because there are not enough women in it — so it’s got that going for it. But, believe me, these days men are congenitally incapable of doing “guy stuff.” There will be plenty of women in this before it’s over. And the person who appears to be the head of the Mandalorians is obviously a woman. So there. Spoiler alerts, but nothing happens in episode three that you don’t easily see coming. The Mandalorian brings his bounty (Baby Yoda) back to the The Client (Werner Herzog). The Client is always accompanied by several well-worn Stormtroopers so you know he’s up to no good. In a plot twist we see coming from a mile away (thus Baby Yoda is a McGuffin at this point), The Mandalorian has second thoughts about leaving the cute little green baby with the big bad Stormtroopers. He returns and blasts his way through the Stormtroopers to get Baby Yoda back. He escapes into the street, but he’s immediately faced by several dozen fellow bounty hunters who (now that Baby Yoda is in the open) are picking up Baby Yoda’s signal on their “pucks” which had been given to all of them in a competition to get the little green fellow. So they all come after Baby Yoda and there’s a big blaster battle. It’s all a bit disappointing because there is no creative edge to this. It’s becoming a Marvel comic book story but with less silliness. But I do hope it becomes a bit more clever and creative. This third episode definitely lagged a bit.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Nov 25, 2019 8:06:39 GMT -8
Today's "Morning Jolt" on NRO has a gushing look at The Mandalorian by Jim Geraghty. He points out the strong support for being armed (not surprising for a warrior cult, I would think). At any rate, you might find it interesting, if only by comparison for your own more mixed review.
He also has further particulars on the rout of pro-Beijing candidates in the Hong Kong district council elections yesterday. Pro-democracy candidates upped their total from 128 to 347 as pro-Beijing councillors fell to 60. This means little in some ways; the district councils run local affairs but aren't involved in the legislative process. (The legislative council is up next year.) But it's an extreme embarrassment for the dictatorship, and makes intervention (i.e., severe repression of the population of Hong Kong) likelier.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 25, 2019 9:01:32 GMT -8
Thanks for the link. Remember (as you do), I don’t grade on a curve. Yes, compared to the junk out there, The Mandalorian is a cut above. But, honestly, I’m losing just a bit of enthusiasm for it after that third episode.
Yeah. Well. Yes, Jim. But it’s just a touch unrealized or untransmitted his sudden desire to save Baby Yoda. Still, this is a condensed style of storytelling…more like an old Western serial. Some of the very old John Wayne Westerns were quaint, even watchable, but they weren't Shakespeare.
Yeah, well, again. That’s the exact bit that I thought was a klunker. There was a legitimate dispute (or at least a dispute) between The Mandalorian and some other testosterone-crazed member of his clan. But when the Mandalorian head chick says “This is the way” it suddenly solved it all and everyone snapped into line and put aside all their hostility. Huh?
Like I said, this episode began to range more into the comic-booky.
No, Jim. It came off as weak. We get so little background into their way of life (just broad hints) that none of this comes across as particularly vital or sincere. Once again we see filmmakers trying to insert punch via mere dialogue alone instead of showing us. They do do (get the Madeline Kahn reference) some of this through a few concentrated flashbacks. We see some tragedy. But it's all a bit too condensed and rushed to really touch you.
I didn’t know that. But I’m not surprised. And at least I know the baseline potential of this series now. It’s going to be a less farcical Marvel comic book movie. But it will be superficial, not deep. But the first two episodes did have a bit of a deeper vibe. And maybe I can just get used to lower expectations.
I actually tried watching one of the Marvel comic book movies the other day (The Avengers). This material is so egregiously stupid, it’s hard to believe they make millions with such pap. The first Iron Man had something going for it. But the first two Iron Man movies I saw were ruined when they ended in an orgasm of bland special effects and a superabundance of cliches.
Still, if one is not aware of having lowered expectations then everything Jim Geraghty said is spot-on. But get ahold of yourself, Jim. It’s not that good. But it has been watchable so far.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 25, 2019 9:26:56 GMT -8
I wish I could say that the way The Mandalorian gave those lines was powerful and inspiring. But it sounded more like he was reading off a fortune cookie.
But I agree with Jim about the essence they were trying to portray with that line:
An interesting interpretation. The only place I differ was that the head chick did not say it in an authoritarian way to shut off all argument. It was more like (as you picked up) a religious-like reference to stir the heart and certainly not a Romanesque Roma locuta est, causa finita est.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Nov 25, 2019 9:36:35 GMT -8
Brad's comments on Jim Geraghty's gusher were exactly what I hoped for. I don't think I need say anything more than that. Thank you.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 25, 2019 10:27:57 GMT -8
Well, thank you. I’m just telling it like I see it, with all the baggage and prejudices attached. But I try to be fair.
And regarding the Madeline Kahn reference (which I’m sure you got) you can find in this outtake reel:
God bless that lady. She was so enormously talented. Mel Brooks mentions this in a video I saw recently:
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Nov 25, 2019 11:36:26 GMT -8
Well, I've seen Young Frankenstein and knew that was it (due to Marty Feldman's appearance) very quickly. But I would associate her mainly with Blazing Saddles, also a Mel Brooks work. Or her appearance on The Muppet Show, in which Gonzo went gonzo over her.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 25, 2019 15:20:46 GMT -8
It’s a legitimate question whether Blazing Saddles or Young Frankenstein is Madeline Kahn’s best movie. Obviously she's more central of a character in Blazing Saddles and has much more to do. Ranker has it this way: Young Frankenstein / Blazing Saddles. That surprises me because, push comes to shove, I’d have to admit she’s probably more memorable in Blazing Saddles even though I think Young Frankenstein is the better movie. But the ranking (for what it’s worth) is close. Clue is listed at #3. I’ve never seen that. I’ll have to see if I can find that.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Nov 25, 2019 20:59:48 GMT -8
I decided to check the Ranker list, and found a few movies I recognized, though I couldn't place Madeline Kahn in them. In High Anxiety, I assume she was the woman who helped Brooks out because her father was effectively imprisoned in the sanitarium. The only other major female character was the sadistic nurse, and I don't think that was Kahn.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 26, 2019 10:20:57 GMT -8
I think it was something like that. I think of this more as a Cloris Leachman film — the slightly disturbed nurse. An interesting thing about this film that I certainly didn’t know was the Mel Brooks consulted Alfred Hitchcock on the script. He even considers him a co-writer. You can find it in part of that interview posted above.
Brooks thinks Hitchcock is the greatest director ever (something he said Billy Wilder did not appreciate hearing). And so he didn’t want to offend Hitchcock in any way. He didn’t. When he first got in contact with Hitchcock, Hitchcock suggested parts that he thought would be best for parody.
Brooks even offers an idea by Hitchcock that never made the film (supposedly for budget considerations). I’m not sure what movie this comes from or whether it’s just a one-off. But Hitchcock has a man being chased through three streets by some thugs who obviously want to kill him. He’ve finally driven to the end of a dock where a ferry is about 12 feet from the shore. The man takes a gigantic leap and lands safely on the ferry. But what he doesn’t know is that the ferry was coming in to the dock. It was hilarious the way Brooks told it.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Nov 26, 2019 10:36:13 GMT -8
That suggestion by Hitchcock sounds unfamiliar. It may be an idea he had that never got made. Supposedly the great crop-duster scene in North by Northwest started with an idea of his about a tornado suddenly appearing in such a scene.
Now we know why High Anxiety is dedicated to Hitchcock, the master of suspense. There were indeed several scenes that beautifully parody actual scenes, such as the superb take-off of the shower scene from Psycho and the birds arriving at the school from The Birds.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 26, 2019 11:22:50 GMT -8
Yeah, that The Birds parody scene is terrific. There are no doubt many Hitchcockian references in High Anxiety that go right over my head.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Nov 26, 2019 11:38:47 GMT -8
The Psycho send-up is even better. It's almost scene-by-scene identical to the original, even to the ink (the original movie was black and white, not color, and the blood in the scene was chocolate sauce) from the newspaper streaming down the drain and his expression as he lies in the tub determining not to tip that particular bellboy.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 29, 2019 10:43:25 GMT -8
The Mandalorian: Episode IV: “Sanctuary”. It could have been titled “Totally Awful”—at least the first ten minutes of it which is where I stopped to pen these thoughts that were bursting to come out of my head.
The episode starts with a scene that looks like it’s right out of “Hercules: The Legendary Journeys.” And although I liked that series, it was self-consciously campy. And that was part of the fun.
Here we start off the episode with a peaceful (presumably) hunter-gatherer tribe gathering blue shrimp in a bog. They are all obviously brown-skinned innocent “people of color.” Then a bunch of savage alien-species hooligans come barging in. (I don’t know if they’re Republicans but they could be.) Of course we’re totally in awe of the writers hitting us with the “child separated from the mother during the scuffle” theme. Mother and daughter hide in the river while the space-hooligans rampage.
Cut to the Mandalorian and Baby Yoda in his spaceship. Baby Yoda is beginning to make the Ewoks seem palatable. He is precocious and cute except for the fact that he (or she) isn’t. It’s forced upon us. And the Mandalorian suddenly becomes another cliche, the father who loves the little tyke but can’t quite control him.
This series started with some promise that it would at least be intelligent. But in the first 10 minutes it’s nothing but a string of cliches. And get ready for the biggest one yet. Although it’s commendable that it took as much as four episodes, we’ve just run into the ass-kicking female. And the scene of the Mandalorian and the ass-kicking female fighting is straight out of “Xena: Warrior Princess,” including the way she is dressed.
We’ve seen all this kind of stuff before. And even if it was new and clever, it’s clear this is aimed at the thirteen-year-old adult-juvenile mindset. I’ll report back on the rest of this episode. Perhaps it picks up. I mean, it can’t get any worse.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 29, 2019 10:48:38 GMT -8
I had to turn it off. I'll be canceling the Disney+ channel soon.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Nov 29, 2019 11:04:32 GMT -8
I actually saw part of an episode of Xena once. It was the one involving Odysseus/Ulysses returning to Ithaca despite the hostility of Poseidon (who actually makes an appearance). I picked up a strong interest in the Greek myths due to my 6th grade teacher's enthusiasm for them, so that one naturally appealed to it. Not enough to start watching it after that.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 29, 2019 11:16:50 GMT -8
Xena was a hoot and many of her episodes were good. Like I said, it was meant to be campy. It worked on that level. You weren’t to take it too seriously. And if you’re going to have an ass-kicking female, make her as photogenic and charismatic as Lucy Lawless.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 29, 2019 11:23:12 GMT -8
I cancelled by Disney+ account just now. It was not an impulsive decision. I had gone through the content they had. Not much was of interest. I would have stayed on for a couple months if this one series looked like it would continue to be promising. That promise was lost.
I may now check out the Apple+ channel and report back. But I think Disney+ is clearly, from my point of view, a flop. But if you have kids, there is plenty of Disney and Pixar content for them. But for adults, the pickings are thin.
|
|