|
Post by artraveler on May 13, 2020 8:54:06 GMT -8
Dreyfus and Flynn
Alfred Dreyfus was an artillery captain in the French army and came to Paris after the Franc/Prussian war of 1871 from Alsace when the New German state took possession after the treaty. In 1894 it was discovered that Germany had an intelligence source in the French military. Dreyfus came under suspicion, probably because he was a Jew and also because he had access to the type of information that had been supplied to the German agent. Despite his protestations of innocence, he was found guilty of treason in a secret military court-martial, during which he was denied the right to examine the evidence against him. The army stripped him of his rank in a humiliating ceremony and shipped him off to life imprisonment on Devil’s Island.
In 2017 Lieutenant General Michael Flynn was appointed to be incoming President Trump National Security Advisor. Flynn was forced to leave this position by a panicked national security apparatus, fearful that he would disclose the, as yet to be uncovered, corruption at CIA, FBI and the DOJ. Following his resignation, Flynn was prosecuted (persecuted) and agreed to plead guilty of perjury to protect his son from prosecution.
Dreyfus seemed destined to die in disgrace. He had few defender’s anti-Semitism was rampant in the French army. An unlikely defender came to his rescue, motivated not by sympathy for Dreyfus but by the evidence that he had been “railroaded” and that the officer who had actually committed espionage remained in position to do.
Lieutenant Colonel Georges Picquart, an unapologetic anti-Semite, was appointed chief of army intelligence two years after Dreyfus was convicted. Picquart, after examining the evidence and investigating the affair in greater detail, concluded that the guilty officer was a Major named Walsin Esterhazy. Picquart soon discovered, however, that the army was more concerned about preserving its image than rectifying its error, and when he persisted in attempting to reopen the case the army transferred him to Tunisia. A military court then acquitted Esterhazy, ignoring the convincing evidence of his guilt.
It was at this point that the renowned novelist Emile Zola took up the case and in a series of newspaper articles denounced the army establishment. Zola had to flee to England, fearing imprisonment for printing the truth. Dreyfus was tried and convicted a second time but later pardoned by the French President. His former rank was restored, but never his reputation.
General Flynn will not have another faux trial. The DOJ has declined to prosecute on the grounds that there is no evidence. Flynn has withdrawn his guilty plea and after spending every dollar of a lifetime of service is given an (Emily Littila never mind.) If it were not for Flynn’s current attorney Sidney Powell the Dreyfus level of corruption would never have been uncovered. Flynn, like Dreyfus, will never recover his reputation. However, President Trump can right this injustice by bringing Flynn into the government.
An interesting side note. One of the reporters sent to Paris to cover the case was Theodore Herzl from Vienna. The overt anti-Semitism of the French army and media convince Herzl that the only solution was a Jewish state in the traditional homeland. Herzl would spend the rest of his life in pursuit of that goal which became fact in May of 1948.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on May 13, 2020 9:03:01 GMT -8
Dreyfus was eventually rehabilitated. It took multiple trials, but the army finally admitted he was innocent -- and even restored him with his rank. He was even promoted later. (Perhaps the most amazing thing was that he remained loyal. But what the heck, so did Iva Toguri despite similar provocations, and she lived to be vindicated and rehabilitated after several decades.) Perhaps something similar can happen with Flynn, such as appointing him to replace Wray at the FBI and clean house there.
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on May 13, 2020 9:05:15 GMT -8
Exactly!
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on May 13, 2020 9:23:07 GMT -8
Incidentally, we could compare roles here: The FBI would be Colonel Henry (who fabricated the evidence to convict Dreyfus), and Barr would be Colonel Picquart. But there's a difference: when it all came out (long before Dreyfus was officially cleared), Colonel Henry committed suicide. Most likely he genuinely believed Dreyfus was guilty and had wanted to make sure they got him -- and when he realized he was mistaken and had sent an innocent man to Devil's Island while letting off the genuine spy (to continue spying on France), his guilt was too much for him. No leftist will do that today because that requires a conscience.
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on May 13, 2020 12:16:19 GMT -8
Can you imagine the firestorm if the central character were Dick Chaney in the Bush administration?
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on May 14, 2020 17:18:16 GMT -8
Given the revelation yesterday of bo administration "unmaskers" there are three and only three ways that FBI could legally spy on Flynn. American citizens have rights under the Constitution as outlined in the Bill of Rights.
1. A formal warrant issued by a judge in which the requesting agency affirms that there is a probably that a crime has been committed. A warrant of this type has to be very specific and is time limited.
2. A FISA warrant affirming that there is probably that a foreign power is engaged in espionage inside the US and that American citizen may or may not be involved. Until the evidence has concluded unlawful activity, our law requires the American citizen name is masked (read citizen 1, 2, 3 etc). FISA requires that unmasking is only done in cases of proven national security.
3. The third way is as the peripheral case of officers overhearing the conservation as a result of surveillance of foreign nationals, who have no protections of a citizen.
These are the talking points from the media and even member of the administration. There is, however a fourth illegal possibility. Suppose a friendly intelligence agency, MI-6 for example were recording a Russian official and those recording were passed to the CIA director and then distributed to the rest of IC. The number of unmask requests in Dec 2016 suggests something was freaking out CIA and MI-6. My guess is that the election in Nov, which all the pros expected HRC to win, suddenly they realized that they were going to have to deal with DJT for the next four years.
The unmask request peak around the 5 Jan ,meeting in the WH where bo's chief of staff made a request. I wonder is there a recording of that meeting? Even Biden made an unmask request. Does anyone believe that direction was not given by the president to everyone in that meeting to get Flynn? I don't.
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Jun 25, 2020 8:07:49 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Jul 10, 2020 6:17:00 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Aug 31, 2020 10:13:37 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Aug 31, 2020 10:35:37 GMT -8
Mark Steyn often discusses the "process is the punishment" treatment he has gotten with his never-ending court case with Michael Mann -- in the DC courts. Not surprisingly, he has a very low opinion of them. I rather suspect that General Flynn agrees.
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Aug 31, 2020 10:45:22 GMT -8
This truly is the Dryfus case. I wonder is there an American Zola?
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Aug 31, 2020 11:00:14 GMT -8
A lot of conservative writers have taken up that role, though I don't if anyone doing this is as well known as Zola was back then.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on Oct 17, 2020 9:04:13 GMT -8
Should you require any further proof of the corruption running rampant in the DOJ, the follow article should help convince you. It is not just a few bad apples at the top. Rotten U.S. Attorneys in NYC
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Oct 17, 2020 10:01:04 GMT -8
It sounds like this may be another case in which the Obama Gang and the Comey Cabal corrupted them (as they did the FBI, IRS, and many other Behemoth bureaus), and it hasn't been cleared out. Unfortunately, civil service laws make it impossible to get rid of everyone who was there during Obama's misrule, and it would hardly be feasible to replace them (or enough of them) anyway.
|
|