kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Apr 29, 2022 6:27:59 GMT -8
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 9, 2022 15:30:16 GMT -8
I think this was the page you were linking to. This is the aspect of "science" that really is science...not all the garbage being brought in through the back door in its name. This is really amazing. That is a tangible result. This is great news...unless those implants can be hacked by Democrat operatives and make people vote a certain way. Wouldn't put it past them.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on May 9, 2022 18:48:37 GMT -8
Yes, it was. Thanks for noting that. I also found the news amazing.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Jul 21, 2022 16:49:45 GMT -8
Another example of the corrupt medical/pharma industry. No doubt we are seeing some of the results of this phony science in the uptick of crazy school shooters. Stuff the boys full of medicines to get them straight now and worry about the long term effects....never. Serotonin is not the answer I also wonder how much "depression" is due to the modern unrealistic view of existence which results in insane expectations of what life "owes" us? Perhaps the loss of faith has much to do with this. I have long said many, if not most, scientific studies are bogus. I expect the trend to continue.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jul 22, 2022 7:53:09 GMT -8
This is where Dennis Prager would come in and say, "If scientific studies don't confirm conventional wisdom, then those studies are likely wrong."
We can say without a doubt that diet and exercise (lack of) can effect one's mood. And there are cases (exceptions are always used to create someone's rule) that chemical imbalances in the brain can cause problems.
But I would say this overall rush to prescribe "antidepressants" (other than money) is driven by a couple things:
+ The view that man is but a material creature (moral concerns are secondary or irrelevant). + People would rather take a pill than amend (let alone admit to) their own destructive behavior.
From the top-down perspective (again, aside from purely monetary concerns), the mostly atheistic "ruling class" prefers to think of mankind as a material thing. If you are fat, it's not because you eat too much. It's because you have "a thyroid problem." To acknowledge a moral dimension to this is called "fat shaming."
This is just one example. But hundreds abound, regarding every perverse or destructive human behavior under the sun. There's nothing wrong with you or your moral choices. It's the fault of "society." Or you just need to take the right pill. Almost completely absent is the idea of personal responsibility...the idea that you are most likely the reason you are "depressed."
Stop eating junk food. Get some exercise. Quite filling your head with the garbage on TV or social media. Most of these cultural cesspools are rampant with spreading the idea that you are a victim, that you are not responsible for shaping the world that you are in.
No doubt there are some people who have what we could term a biological propensity for depression. But even then, another aspect of this is that we all have different personality traits. There are different types of people, some more outgoing than others. Some more boisterous than other. And, yes, some more happy than others (all else being equal). This is where I diverge from what I think is Dennis Prager's (and our culture's) misguided and destructive emphasis on "happiness."
Most of the time we're just not going to be buoyantly happy as a norm. But that is the accepted and expected state of affairs today. So if you're not happy all the time, you must be "depressed." More importantly (and this really is the key to all this), when your unreasonable expectations of life go unmet, that is the cause for much unhappiness.
So we need to embrace more reasonable expectations of life. Yes, it's fine to pursue things that give you a sense of fulfillment or accomplishment. Even so, only a fool thinks that such pursuits will somehow kick on an ever-present "happiness" field that never goes aware or dissipates. Each day is different. And to some extent, each day is a struggle. That is reality. And reality is not popular these days, especially among the morally debased or the victim-minded.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Jul 29, 2022 19:51:05 GMT -8
Another example of the corrupt world of medical "science." Alzheimer's study a fraud The people who performed and published this study should have to undergo suffer something like Alex did in A Clockwork Orange . Perhaps their behavior would also be modified.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Jul 29, 2022 21:10:33 GMT -8
Some are finally beginning to see the criminal behavior of the "medical" community in regard to "gender identity" problems. Biggest medical crime I think the KFF fraud and vaccine are a bigger crime, but this one is big enough.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jul 30, 2022 6:17:12 GMT -8
Still trying to wrap my head around this widespread "settled science" stuff. Maybe it all has to do with money. But isn't there a LOT of money in finding real cures? Why the groupthink? Why the suppression of contrary lines of inquiry in a pursuit (research) where is is the norm to have many lines of inquiry?
Is this groupthink adhere-to-orthodoxy the mindset now instilled in college? I would have to think that is a large part of it.
Yes, this is happening all over the place. Including Trump supporters. I'm also going to posit that the inclusion of women in science (where "feelings" count more than facts) has something to do with this as well.
But it is also true that scientific orthodoxy (despite all evidence) goes back thousands of years. People cling to views just because it would indeed be a bruising to their egos to admit otherwise. Throw in the effects of large amounts of money, feelings-over-fact, and this lunatic cult of Progressives who think they are "saving the world" and it's a recipe for junk science. And it's amazing to see that junk science has become the orthodoxy in so many areas.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jul 30, 2022 6:37:07 GMT -8
I would say the abuse of children's minds by the public schools and teacher's unions is the biggest scandal (medical, in that it is abusing their minds and psychology). But point taken.
It's worth noting again that no child is ever going to come to the conclusion, unassisted, that they need puberty-blocking drugs or gender reassignment. This is the result of weird and perverted adults imposing their views on children. Shame on any parent anywhere who kept their child in a school that had even a remote connection to this, as well to any kind of support of "transgenderism" which is the gateway drug to all this.
Oh, gee. Who woulda thought? I bet it took billions in research dollars to figure that out.
Yours Truly noted long ago that this was a function of groupthink instilled by "social" media, and not some real phenomenon of being a boy caught in a girl's body, or vice versa. (By the way, I'm a 17th century soul caught in a Progressive-21st century body).
Told you so. Told you so. told you so. And women drive this phenomenon because of their emphasis on emotional issues.
I'm sorry about the harm you caused to yourself, aided and abetted by adults (and a lot of hysterical women) but you are a dumb fuck for cutting off your breasts because of a desire for some kind of fashionable change. But at least you're now speaking out against this stuff, which is to your credit. A dollar short and a day late, but it's something.
I told you so. I told you so. I told you so. This is a chick thing.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 20, 2022 11:42:29 GMT -8
Looks like what was formerly called the British Medical Journal has caught up with me, or more correctly said, they are finally admitting what they have known for many years. You can't trust medical research studies I have believed this for several decades. Maintaining my position has not made me popular with a particular friend in the medical business.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Aug 21, 2022 6:54:08 GMT -8
Isn't that the truth. One of the sad things the Left had done is undermine trust in institutions...even when that trust was well-established and deserved. But now it is not deserved. The default position should be skepticism. Prove it. Show me.
Imagine one of these drug company clowns having an advertising where the disclaimer fast-reader at the end says all that stuff. At least it would honest...more honest.
If these are friggin' medical trials, imagine how many zombies (bots) that Twitter really has. I believe there is a deeper reason for all this fraudulence other than laziness or money. I know a lot of women have been fast-tracked into "research" (I have a niece) and I wonder how much Elizabeth Holmes you-go-girl stuff is woven into the fabric of the research industry. We mustn't question this data or else we're questioning the competence of a woman. Etc.
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Aug 21, 2022 7:01:22 GMT -8
The default position should be skepticism. Prove it. Show me.
If it can't be shown with provable numbers it is just another theory not research. That applies to just about everything and not just medicine.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 21, 2022 9:05:25 GMT -8
100%. This has long had me very pissed off. When people lose trust in their institutions, they become un-tethered from societal anchors. I am not saying that one has to slavishly accept everything those in power tell us. Rather I am saying that the institutions must do their best to ensure that they are standing for truth. I want the people who approve elevators in high rises buildings to know what they are doing and be honest.
Chesterton's saying can be applied to cover many areas other than religion. The left has been undermining our institutions intentionally for decades.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Aug 25, 2022 16:00:53 GMT -8
The "scientists" behind this should be sealed in a dungeon for life, with only a slot for passing in food. Synthetic embryos The following lines, taken from the piece give me no comfort. Scientists, particularly medical scientists, have turned out to be some of the biggest liars and most evil people in the world. Why would we trust them? This place would be appropriate except the drain is too large.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Oct 10, 2022 9:43:55 GMT -8
An interesting article on a study about the efficacy of colonoscopies. As would seem to so often be the case, the medical establishment appears to have adopted magical thinking over the years. This is common, especially if there is more money in it for the doctors. Not so effective as claimed
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Jul 20, 2023 12:30:57 GMT -8
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jul 22, 2023 18:05:30 GMT -8
That's shocking. I've always heard that you're taking your life in your own hands when visiting a hospital.
I wonder how those rates compare with Europe and the rest of the world.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Jul 22, 2023 19:06:24 GMT -8
I would expect the comparisons to be all over the place. Parts of Europe and Asia, like Singapore, could be similar or better. Much of the rest of the world would be worse.
The basic information has been known for decades. I believe I previously mentioned that the Wall Street Journal published an article in the 1980s which claimed such deaths in USA hospitals to be something like 80,000 per year, as I recall. Much of that was due to cross-infections spread by hospital personnel, including doctors who were often cavalier about disinfecting their hands after seeing a patient. I know that to be true as I saw it and heard from hospital administrators the trouble they had getting to M.D.s to do this.
I am familiar with this as a friend owned a new disinfectant and I did some work for him in Asia. While doing my research I also came across some study which said that for about 80% of those in hospitals, whatever is going to happen to them would happen regardless, i.e. the hospital visit will make no difference to their getting well or dying. For twenty percent in hospitals, the visit was very important. About 10% got better through the medical intervention of the hospital and about 10% got worse due to hospital screw ups. I think the recent KFF fraud should convince even the biggest skeptic as to the truth of this, particularly the screw ups.
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Jul 22, 2023 19:45:24 GMT -8
The basic information has been known for decades. Indeed, I recommend to my doctors that they watch George C. Scott in, The Hospital, at least once a year. So, far, to my chagrin, only one has admitted watching the movie and commenting on it. www.imdb.com/title/tt0067217/
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jul 22, 2023 20:18:34 GMT -8
Very interesting statistic. I hadn't heard that one before.
|
|