LBGTQRSTUVWXYZ Evil

I remember reading in the mid-1990s, I think in the American Spectator, about a female Navy pilot who wanted to be a carrier pilot.  Her ambition was certainly laudable, and she even had experience at one of the notorious Tailhook events (where she fit in well and did NOT complain).  Sadly, she seemed to be a bit short on the ability (flying from a carrier is especially difficult), but the Patsy-whipped Navy passed her anyway.  And then she crashed and died flying from a carrier.  It was a tragic loss of someone who could have been quite useful elsewhere.  But the people who passed her, and those who pushed it to happen (such as the infamous Putzy Schroeder), didn't care.

Dennis Prager takes on the transgender nonsense:

Air Canada to Its Passengers: ‘Screw You’ by Dennis Prager

One commenter has a terrific idea….something I’ve wished for as well

Goad has made a very succinct estimation.  I hope I can remember it well enough to use it in the future.  It's basically the same point I've made, but better made.

Well, I think the inversion is an accurate description.  I gather you're thought is that leftists do this out of an emotional rejection of social traditions rather than on some rational basis.  That makes sense.  If they were behaving rationally, they probably wouldn't be so committed to sexual dysphoria.

Male tops U of Montana’s women’s cross-country team

The comments section is predictable…predictably sensible, in this case. The two prevailing attitudes (which by no means are mutually-exclusive) are:

1) A pox on their house. This is what the feminists voted for and continue to enable. I’ll pop the popcorn while we watch things implode.

2) The women should not participate if a man is trying to compete against them as a woman and just leave him by himself at the starting line.

I started a book on grammar that I found on the online library. It was highly rated. I couldn’t get through the introduction is was so badly written.

What I’m trying to say is (Does he know? Does he know) is that the circuits of Nomad, the computer, from "The Changeling" would be smoking from the illogic of it all. The bizarre is becoming normal. Our sin is that we haven’t adapted to crazy yet.

But think of the opportunities. If something as obvious as male and female is considered subjective, why can’t I declare myself a chimpanzee for purposes of paying taxes? Chimps and other monkeys (I know, I know) don’t pay taxes. But why can’t I identify as an ape?

And if I was an older man who wanted to have sex with 16-year-old girls, why couldn’t I just identify as a 16-year-old boy? If an actual cock-and-balls is not an objective fact in this world, age would seem to be something surely less objective. As they say, you’re as young as you feel. Certainly in the present scheme of identity fluidity, one could be as young as you identify.

For the record, I’m a Bonobo. For a monkey, they’re a little more refined. But they still are not required to send in a 1040 form to the IRS every year.

Mae West, who was a libertine, and what would be known as worldly wise, wrote the following:

“In many ways homosexuality is a danger to the entire social system of Western civilization. Certainly a nation should be made aware of its presence — without moral mottoes — and its effects on children recruited to it in their innocence. I had no objection to it as a cult of jaded inverts... involved only with themselves. It was its secret, anti-social aspects I wanted to bring into the sun. As a private pressure group it could, and has, infected whole nations."

Pretty clever for an actress.

The modern insanity regarding sex confusion, which pervades the West, has its roots in the push to normalize abnormal behavior between two males. It was and is an attack on our Judeo-Christian traditions, with the destruction of morality as its object.