|
|
Post by artraveler on Oct 24, 2019 18:33:57 GMT -8
From the Federalist today
During her testimony Georgulas stated she is not the biological mother of James or his twin brother Jude. She purchased eggs from a biological stranger. This illuminates a well-known truth in the world of family and parenthood: biological parents are the most connected to, invested in, and protective of their children
This put a whole different spin on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Oct 24, 2019 18:55:22 GMT -8
This makes things even more interesting. Were the eggs inseminated by the father? If so, then he is the biological father and she is NOT the biological mother, which means that he should have primary or even sole custody. Add to this her ideological behavior, which she certainly prefers to behaving as a mother, and the jury's decision becomes even more insane. Fortunately, a judge put this in abeyance today and the state government (all GOP, of course) is checking into the matter.
We keep hoping that some incident will be the one that drops the scales from the public's eyes. Maybe i wil be this. Maybe it will be Rachel McKinnon's vile behavior. Maybe when some "transgender" (or a man claiming that status) will use it to commit rape against a rape survivor in a shelter or a young girl.
But none of that matters if the synoptic media don't report it. Ideology first, decency later if at all. Theirs is a Leninist code of ethics, which is basically tribal with the tribe defined ideologically.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Oct 24, 2019 19:54:17 GMT -8
This is beginning to look more depraved than I thought. It is a well know fact that twins are the gold standard for both medical and psychological experiments/tests. One must now begin to consider the possibility that this "Dr." wanted to conduct a long-term psych test dealing with nature vs. nurture. It would be logical to assume that she already had an end result in mind, i.e. that gender is merely a social construct.
If it turns out that my supposition is close, the woman should be incarcerated for the rest of her natural life.
|
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Oct 24, 2019 20:01:03 GMT -8
But none of that matters if the synoptic media don't report it. The most insidious power of the media is the power to ignore. |
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Oct 24, 2019 21:03:02 GMT -8
Yes, at best this is serious child abuse. That would be something like her wanting a girl and a boy and since she has two boys, converting one of them into a boy. That's bad enough. If she just wanted to create an experiment (and probably one with carefully fudged data to boot), it's even far worse.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Oct 30, 2019 8:06:07 GMT -8
National Review has (had?) an article about men posing as women. I read it on the front page of NRO just this morning and now I can’t find it. But here’s the direct link: Rachel McKinnon Is a Cheat and a Bully by Madeleine Kearns. It’s surprising to see something like this at NRO. Shouldn’t she be fired? Shouldn’t Mark Steyn be re-hired? What gives? The headline, at least, is decidedly non-namby-pamby. The article itself is typical of the genre, using a whole lot of words to note a simple truth: men are not women no more than fire is water or September is October. After kinda-sorta reading the riot act to these bullies, she ends her article with a feint toward namby-pamby: Okie doke. That certainly clarifies the situation. To me, a man or woman who forces others to adopt whatever delusion they have about their gender is a bully. I’d no more accept their identity than I would someone playing Rhett Butler in a community theatre play — at least outside the confines of the stage. As a conservative, I’m undecided as to whether or not support and encourage freaks such as McKinnon. And, why does the headline of this article refer to him as “Rachel” if the point is to reject the delusion of a man pretending to be a woman? This is decidedly a mixed message. The subheadline of the article is “So why are we humoring him?” Yes, indeed. But at least they used the word, “him.” One commenter writes: I find it hard to argue with that. This is a case of being hoisted by your own petard. I agree with this observation as well: And consistent with a recent topic: So now what someone needs to do is tell us what the analogous nomenclature should be for this Pickett’s Charge. |
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Nov 6, 2019 22:12:09 GMT -8
The little boy whose mother claims he wants to be a girl is going to school dressed as a boy. Strange! Sick MamaSome are giving the mother the benefit of the doubt by saying she might have a mental problem. |
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Nov 7, 2019 7:04:13 GMT -8
I'm surprised that there was no discussion of the mother's politics. A lot of leftists place their political agendas above everything, so it's entirely possible that she would sacrifice a child to it. It's also been suggested that she wanted to have a boy and a girl. I suspect that such desires, and the unnatural ways some parents respond to it, may be more common than we would like to think.
But the influence of the sexually dysphoric on professional organizations is sadly unsurprising. No one wants to say "no" to leftist organizations and risk being smeared and boycotted. One way or another, we must find a way to break this power. It gives them influence far beyond their actual numbers or merit.
As for the mother being mentally sick, I don't doubt it. If nothing else, leftism itself is a form of mental derangement.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 7, 2019 9:44:23 GMT -8
There is no purer example to show that “transgendering” if just a whole new way to hate men.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 7, 2019 10:18:34 GMT -8
Dennis Prager had an article the other day about his appearance on Bill Maher. The long and the short of it was that he was booed and ridiculed by the audience when Dennis Prager told them that the Left believes an alternative reality of ideas that includes they idea that men can menstruate. The audience was unaware of this new “fact.” But you know in six months they will be adamant that indeed “men” can menstruate. |
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Nov 7, 2019 10:37:38 GMT -8
Actually, there are already leftists proclaiming that. This shows up in demands for female hygiene products in men's rooms, and in denouncing the femocrat celebration The Vagina Monologues because it at least implies that only women have vaginas. Maher's audience was awfully ignorant if they were unaware of this, but of course they are leftists. It's just a matter of time before this becomes another leftist norm.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Nov 7, 2019 10:46:08 GMT -8
The funniest part of that article was:  Here's an article about that. |
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Dec 2, 2019 21:31:37 GMT -8
Dennis Prager pens a piece which is further proof of America's imminent decline and fall. The Left Hates the Salvation ArmyI believe I have said it before, my father told me that the Salvation Army was the only charity that really took care of the troops in WWII. Whenever he saw someone from the Salvation Army out collecting contributions he would give them something. In fact, that is how I first learned of them as a child. Someone in a uniform came up to us and my father reached into his pocket and gave them something. That was when he told me how they helped the soldiers with true charity unlike, in his opinion, some other "charitable" other organizations. Chick-Fillet folded like a cheap suit recently and stopped giving to the Salvation Army. I will no longer frequent Chick-Fillet. I call others to avoid them as well. |
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Dec 2, 2019 21:45:09 GMT -8
Yes, I read and responded to that interesting article. I remember that my parents praised the Salvation Army when I was young, but I don't recall any explanation of why or what they did in contributing (though I'm sure they did something).
I don't know if I would favor a boycott of Chick-fil-A, though recent reports would indicate that this is merely the continuation (they may think it's the culmination, but it won't be) of a sinister evolutionary process there. But at the very least it's time to end the conservative buycott that has buoyed their sales.
|
|
kungfuzu
Member
Posts: 10,469
Member is Online
|
Post by kungfuzu on Jan 4, 2020 15:03:56 GMT -8
The Lesbian Legion and Butt Gig Brigade have wormed their way into all old-line protestant denominations. At least, some Methodists are standing against this perversion of biblical teaching and demanding a split from the modern Molochian Methodists who practice satanic behavior. I will await the real fight which will take place when a division of Church assets is discussed. Methodists |
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Jan 4, 2020 15:39:29 GMT -8
I've heard of similar thoughts among Episcopalians, but as far as I know nothing has happened yet. There are in fact some talking about a schism throughout the Anglican communion, with the religious conservatives perhaps being led by the Nigerian archbishop.
|
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on Jan 4, 2020 22:10:39 GMT -8
Michael Brown has an article on the possible Methodist split. It seems that the overall vote was against the homosexualist groups. American churches favored it, but not enough to make up for Methodists elsewhere (such as the Philippines). So the leftists would be the schismatics, unlike the situation with APEC -- if this in fact happens. He also predicts this would lead to the churches moving further apart as the conservative church grows and the leftist church shrinks. The link is:
|
|
|
|
Post by artraveler on Jan 5, 2020 7:00:54 GMT -8
This is a split long coming. Presbyterians split up several years ago. The challenge in the main line Christian church organizations as the home church owns the property the leaving church stands on. The same franchise model McDonald's took in the 50s to expand and control franchises. Christian charity seems to stop when million dollar properties are involved.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Jan 6, 2020 9:56:08 GMT -8
I have often used the “franchise model” when critiquing what passes for modern churches. But I just never understood how deep that actually went. Very interesting to point that out, Artler.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,238
|
Post by Brad Nelson on Feb 8, 2020 9:13:42 GMT -8
Here’s an NRO article titled Creepy Pete by Michael Brendan Dougherty. The article beats successfully around the bush, avoiding the central fact that one commenter nailed: Butt-gig’s one and only qualification is being a homosexual. If Biden became his running mate, he’d soon be saying things like: “"I mean, you got the first mainstream homosexual who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.” |
|
