The Feminist Inquisition

Oh my god. LOL. That's great. I'm surprised this feminist chick is being so honest about it.



Not having grown up as a female in the rich man-hating (really, woman-hating) feminist environment that females now grow up in, my knowledge is limited. But I don't think you have to resort to the above Freudian claptrap to explain how yet another woman became alienated from traditional female roles and things. Being a Jew (and apparently an intelligent one), it's easy to see that she was over-thinking it.

Her mother sounds like a real gem though. There she had the perfect role model in front of her all the time. Instead she chose to try to be a man in a man's world, so to speak. She rejected the deepest part of herself in order to satisfy what all the man-hating feminists said she should be.



Hmmm. There's a thought.



I wonder if a whole lot of Jews have been screwed up by this Freud junk. Who speaks in terms of "essential forces" regarding needing to make a living? Or love? A weird way to think.

My thought was that in the zeal to overturn religion and replace it with "reason," a lot of garbage (including most of Freudianism) has been accepted...merely because it is modern and "scientific."

The truth is, it's doubtful you could have a better insight into the human soul than that already offered by the Torah or the Bible.



Without a doubt. And some of what B.F. Skinner taught also offered insights. But the main problem is the one of trying to cram a spiritual-immaterial round peg into an atheist-materialist square hole.

Some insights, yes. But only around the edges.

I submit that feminism turns women into psychopaths: Tim Scott Shuts Down Treasury Secretary's Claim That Women Need Abortion to Succeed. Tim Scott doesn't use that language but basically nails this monster for it tangentially.



So there you have it, honestly stated: The purpose of feminism is to industrialize the woman.

The very heart of the thing. Morlocks feasting on Eloi.

Doesn't sound as if Woke Navy was doing very well.



My guess is that a lot of women didn't want to be seen buying stuff at what was now "the fat store."



Let me translate that for you: Women will not be held to traditional standards of health and beauty as inflicted on them by that vile creature, men.

In the old days, i.e. about 15 years back, I said the one of the big reasons queer marriage was being pushed on us was because lawyers wanted a new income stream from all the queer divorces which would inevitably take place.  

It was not the main reason behind the push for queer marriage, but it was one which was based on palpable material gain instead of some "higher" goal. As regards people, I will always take greed over "goodness" as a motivator, particularly in politics.

In this case, one only has to think of a couple of points which make my idea more likely. 1) Homosexuals have a higher earning rate than straight people. 2) Homosexual relationships are notoriously unstable and fluid.

Thus it (queer divorce) was like having a cherry on top. The sundae (queer marriage) is the main thing, but that cherry is a real nice extra. What's not to like from a lawyer's point of view? Lawyers have to eat too.

I believe most people, particularly Americans, have a real problem grasping the fact that others do not necessarily think the same way they do.

I find many Americans have little interest in much other than that which they perceive as effecting their immediate lives. They give scant thought to much that is complex, spiritual or foreign to their experience or imagination, which is fairly limited.  Considering the possibility that things may not be exactly as they believe is perhaps too disturbing, so they do not do much considering.  

In a word, many Americans are extremely poorly informed as they are too lazy to inform themselves. It takes time and effort which could be better put to use playing video games. 

If anyone disagrees with me, then I would like an explanation as to how the KFF fraud was perpetrated so easily. How so many have simply accepted the lies which the news media has spewed forth for decades. How so many could go along with the obviously vicious lies about gender, etc. 

This is one of the reasons I do not have much intercourse with people. They often have no idea what I am talking about, because they have had nothing like the same experiences I have had. Try talking to an "average" American about a serious subject and see how that goes.  But they sure know about the Cowboys or Rangers. 

While I agree there are many wonderful people out there, I probably think that number to be somewhat smaller than some believe. Small kindnesses are great, (I have noted many such kindnesses which I was the recipient of in this blog) we should all try to increase our performance of these, but they are called small for a reason. In my opinion, if you want to see how good someone truly is, take note of what he or she does when their actions could, or will, cost them something.   To do something, help another simply because it is right and moral without thought of reward, on the contrary, knowing it will cost you, is in my opinion, the mark of a wonderful person.  

That said, I am perfectly aware that most of our daily interactions with others are not and cannot be very deep. Thus, small kindnesses, politeness, consideration for others, even just an absence of rudeness do make much of life more pleasant.  I am thankful for these. 

Those kinds are few and far between. Yes, it's easy to be nice about the small stuff. The larger stuff, not so easy or common.

Yes, that's a great quote.

I found the quote I was looking for from The Spy and the Traitor:



Now, I know I don't need to twist your arm to admit to the resemblance of today's PC "woke" culture to this. And I just wish that at least the conservatives would realize that self-censoring themselves to avoid retribution from the Communists is the kind of assent-by-silence that we don't need. Someone please tell Dennis Prager that using someone's made-up pronoun is just bolstering their perverse and totalitarian world.

And that other quote (which I know you've heard) is: "Silence is consent," which apparently comes from the Talmud (or is at least also featured there).

When Catholics don't speak out against their far left wing nutty pope, they are giving this Marxist whack-job their consent. You know the principle. Just giving an example.