Climate Con

This is a war on civilization conducted by people who can not drive a car with a standard transmission. We ha have rolling blackouts in CA and even TX is having trouble with the grid due to environmental tinkering by morons. What is happening in Sri Lanka, Ghana and the Netherlands could happen here. Look at the pictures from Sri Lanka, that is a real rebellion not some idiot with a horn hat.  

Again, I'm trying to wrap my mind around the full significance of Environmentalism as a Religion. Yes, the gangster at the top just want to wreck civilization as it exists just like a child's first impulse is to tip over a stack of alphabet blocks.

But the Environmental Religionists give them the power. I was listening to King FM just now (a puke of a Seattle station, but they do play classical music). And they were doing some short bio on some musician from California. And the radio guy mentioned "How climate changed had devastated her beloved California."

Did California drop into the ocean and I missed it? How are they devastated by climate change? Kooks. Nuts. Flakes. And they give power to the gangsters at the top.

Very interesting analysis.



Which brings us back that this is inherently a religion...a secular-humanist mass-movement apocalyptic one where they are the savior, not Jesus or Jehovah.

We should make t-shirts with that printed on it just as a conversation piece.



Remember that Dutch artist I linked to recently who was engaging in "Van Life"? I could be wrong, but I believe "Housing Crisis" means "Regulations driven by environmental wackoism have drastically driven up the cost of even a starter house, therefore it has become compelling for many to live in a van by the side of the road."

Surely there are other factors as well. But what our society never learned from the 2008 housing bust was (as Thomas Sowell noted back then) that the problem was the "open space" and other environmental utopian laws which had driven up the costs of housing and made existing mortgage payments (which, I think, were not tied to a fix interest rate) untenable. Plus, the social requirement of giving away loans to the "racially correct" races (with little regard as to whether they could pay them back or not) contributed to the bubble as well.

It wasn't (as far as I understand) a function of the "evil, greedy banks." The "evil greedy banks" were doing their best to handle all those dog-shit loans by packaging them up and selling them off.

Clearly Holland faces exactly the same thing: Unrealistic utopian (or just plain Marxist) social directives have run head-on into reality. If you want farmers, if you want food, if you want a functioning society, you can't obsess over soda-pop fizz, aka "carbon." Carbon is the food plants need. It's not a poison. Women shouldn't vote. Oops. That just sort of slipped in there . But it is a big part of the problem.

You know, I'm a believer in psychology up to a point. I don't think someone goes out and rapes a woman because of an Oedipus complex. But many times there are underlying causes, whether in the catch-all category of "unconscious" motivations, or something else. We have instincts, drives, and yes, human psychology, that most of us are not aware of.

So with the caveat on mind, I do think it is possible, even probable, that this hatred of "carbon" has some grounding in hatred of humans and ultimately to hatred of self. Is not the aborted fetus more about aborting one's hated and limiting womanhood than it is about the child (for we know that considerations of the child are given short shrift)? Or at least partially?

A good reminder. Scroll down just a bit. 


Cold to Hot

It's peeking under their dress. The best analogy I can think of is the outrageous stuff written by Hitler in Mein Kampf or given orally in a speech. "Oh, that's just hyperbole for the masses. Once he's in office, he'll be middle-of-the-road German."

Nope. He really believed what he said. And we should think no less of the Environmental Wackos. They are wacko...and they are dangerous.

More insight coming.

There's no escaping it. I'm a racist. It's worth noting that most of the depopulation that anyone is concerned about is depopulating white people. If Europe is over-populated (re-populated) by Muslims or North America is re-populated by those from the South, the actual policies of the Left show they're not particularly squeamish in regards to amount as they are to kind.

The homeless you have in your area my be different. But from what I've seen of the Bremerton, Seattle, and Portland "homeless," they are overwhelmingly white, thus this is not really a concern. It just serves them right. They stole this land from other people.

There is a very good test to determine whether someone is liberal or conservative, no matter what they call themselves or think about themselves. I've seen the video below before several Edmonton Oiler games. And there is a similar "land acknowledgment" before Seattle Kraken games:



To me, this comes off as a sad parody. There are no warm-fuzzies. Here again the Native Americans ("First Nation," in Canada, sorry) is being used for the purposes of white people. There is no talk about giving 10% of the take at the gate to the Indians, or even giving back the land. But thy shall assuage all liberal white guilt via this "land acknowledgement."

If I was a Native American (or "First Nationer"), I would be pissed off to be used in this way. But that's just me. A conservative. Liberals will think this type of thing is showing the utmost respect.

I had to find an article about this that provided a comment section. I'm not swayed by the "big loss offset by profits in other divisions" cheerleading. The one at Fox will do:

The first comment:



I certainly disagree with the dopey political reasons that electric vehicles are pushed as green. "Green" means you plug your car in somewhere and the electricity is without pollution and somehow spontaneously generated out of thin carbon-free air. "Green" is a term for idiot liberals who may think this electricity is generated by unicorn farts or solar cells on someone's garage, not real-world power plants (hydro, oil, coal, or nuclear).

That said, there are many advantages to an electric vehicle. But whether the near-term Utopian visions can overcome the shorter-term realities is anyone's guess. I suspect there will be growing pains as reality begins to intrude a bit.

Here's another comment that inextricably mixes up the political with the technical:



No, certainly electric cars should not be hailed as something that will "save the planet," etc., especially since we know that the materials that go into them are harder on the environment than an internal combustion automobile. And those batteries don't last forever and could make the old unsightly tire dumps look like a playground in comparison. And those batteries are extremely expensive. Those who "bought into the dream" probably had no idea that the initial cost of the EV was simply a down payment.

But from a technical standpoint, they are pretty good right now and cover the range needed by people in 60% of cases. The rest of them put on their tin foil hats and "live the dream" as they virtue-signal to the world that they are "saving the planet" while they stop every few miles for a half hour or more to recharge. Not the car for Texans, that's for sure.

But just because idiot liberals and other virtue-signalers underplay the reality doesn't mean that electric vehicles don't have a future. They have an extremely solid future, especially backed as they are by government and tax breaks. And although batteries are expensive now, one can foresee that the maintenance saving of an electric car vs. a gas powered one would be significant….down the road somewhere. That road right now cost Ford 2 or 3 billion. I didn't read an opinion whether this was a shortfall of the technology (or market) or that perhaps no one wanted Ford's electric cars compared to the competition.