David Frenchism

Thank you, John Nolte, for stating what some of us already knew. But doing so at a much more visible site is very good indeed.

One gets the impression that there is no hand on the tiller at National Review. There are maybe three or four authors there worth reading. But the rest is a compendium of junk that makes American Thinker look thoughtful.

This is more than just disagreeing about an issue. I think there is something fundamentally wrong with Williamson. But there for the grace of God go all of, I suppose. Thus when I caution to keep an even keel and not go off half-cocked, just think of a new term for it: Don’t become Williamized. Or Goldbergized, for that matter.

It’s almost never a difference of opinion that bothers me. It’s the dishonesty that I can’t take.

An impressive article that would be better if he also pointed out those victimized by leftist ideology -- such as the girls in various sports being trounced (in some fields, quite literally) by boys claiming to identify as girls.  But no one has unlimited space.

Here is further proof that Goldberg is dishonest, stupid or both. He is certainly no conservative.

Goldberg has certainly gone off the deep end.

Oh, my.  David French can look at the recent SCOTUS decision (unless he wrote before it), Demagogue persecution of Christian businesses that refuse to celebrate homosexual marriage, and states forced to back down on laws protecting women from sexually dysphoric men in sports, rape shelters, and bathrooms, and see Christians winning . . . He obviously lives in Cloud-Cuckoo-Land.

This is known as sophistry, and is common among leftists.  It's clever but cynical argument designed to push a cause that can't be supported more honestly.  These Never Trumpers have a choice between their principles and Orange Man Bad, and in the end the latter matters more to them.  So they have to choose between the sophistry of David French or the total political invertion of Jenny Rubin and Max Boot (and earlier David "I'm a liar, trust me" Brock).

I couldn't agree more with this article. The writer shows what a bunch of bums reside at NRO. They all hated Trump's character so they backed someone with an even worse character. As I said before, NRO was taken over by globalist Wall Street interests when Buckley retired and sold it.

NRO has got what it wished for

I like some of the comments below the piece. Someone notes that the only person at NRO who is not a sell out is Victor David Hanson. Again, I couldn't agree more.

The scoundrel French is at his lying-lick-spittle best in his most recent article telling us not to push back against CRT in schools. While I found the above quote very good, I am not sure French is only seeking a "Good boy" from the left. The man is not stupid. I figure he his more of an enemy working behind the lines of conservatives. He is like the mRNA "vaccines" that aren't vaccines, rather they are medical experiments. French is like the artificially produced spike protein which the elites tell us is good for us, but is proving to be very bad for many. French is doing his best to inject a deadly pathogen into the conservative body.  Curse him and his fellow travelers.

Here is the article from which I took the quote. 


The David French Disease

That is the closing paragraph of a wonderful piece, which confirms everything we have been saying about those whores Goldberg, French, the National Review, the American Enterprise Institute, the Cato Institute and the rest of the "conservative" think tanks that have been the so-called "leading thinkers" of the conservative movement.

I believe we now have a definition for "David Frenchism"....street walking or good old fashioned harlotry, in an intellectual sense at the very least.

Then again, I guess Goldberg and French, as well as libertarians would make the case that being a whore is a conservative occupation. After all, one is exchanging a service for money.

We all knew Goldberg and French were phonies