|
Post by kungfuzu on May 2, 2020 10:07:49 GMT -8
I noticed that as well, but I don't think it was meant to be the Liberty Bell. It looks like a ribbon hanging from a small ring at the place where the two branches cross.
I thought it looked like the ribbon hanging in the back of Marcus Aurelius' head on the first coin Brad posted. It made me wonder do flowing ribbons have some allegoric meaning?
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 2, 2020 10:18:13 GMT -8
I found this about the symbology of ribbons. I don’t know if it pertains to either of the coins mentioned: Importance of power, even miraculous power? Longevity (for generations, for successions? Good luck, good fortune? It’s certainly not impossible that some Chinese symbolism had leaked to the Western world over the centuries.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 2, 2020 19:56:11 GMT -8
I call this one, Bottle Cap. Did you guys grow up on Dad’s root beer? I did. This particular bottle cap is a promotional one. It has a 1959 penny encapsulated into the back of it. CapCam
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on May 2, 2020 20:00:48 GMT -8
I had my share of root beer, but I don't know what brand. In recent years, I've mainly seen A&W. Sometimes on post-graduation visits to see friends at Purdue back in the 70s, we would eat occasionally at an A&W restaurant, which was low-budget (paper plates and plastic tableware, e.g.) but decent food.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on May 2, 2020 20:05:16 GMT -8
Yup. I was the root beer drinker in our house. These days I don't drink it often, but I like IBC and A&W the best. Barq's is not bad. Dad's has a somewhat strange taste to me now.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 2, 2020 20:13:46 GMT -8
The previous bottle cap was adjusted in Affinity Photo. I’m new to it and so what you’re seeing is practice, not necessarily fine photography. The following is the exact same image adjusted in Photoshop which I’ve had much more experience in. The results are truer to life. If you think getting colors right is a chore, you'd be right. CapCam2
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 2, 2020 20:19:37 GMT -8
I’m not familiar with IBC Root Beer, Mr. Brew. Sounds good. Nothing beats a root beer float with some good-quality vanilla ice cream. I did have some homemade sarsaparilla a few years ago at a renaissance fair. It was the best “root beer” I’ve ever had. Fantastic. Put that on your list of homebrew projects. Or mine. Never tried it, but this one looks good:
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on May 2, 2020 20:23:33 GMT -8
I used to love root beer floats. I think I had more A&W floats than any other kind. Somehow the smoothness of the root beer compliments the creaminess of good vanilla ice cream. Coke floats aren't bad but the acidity of Coke doesn't compliment the ice cream in quite the same way.
Here is what IBC Root Beer looks like.
Bickfords looks like it should be good.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on May 2, 2020 20:55:59 GMT -8
I've never had sarsaparilla, though I wouldn't mind giving it a try. Not going to happen here in my nursing home, I suspect. I remember that it was frequently named as a drink on F Troop, though even as a kid I assumed that was really something else (beer, probably). I think I first encountered it once in Stuart Little.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 3, 2020 8:30:45 GMT -8
For all intents and purposes, sarsaparilla tastes like root beer (at least the varieties known in the United States, but not apparently what they drink in Australia). It has an interesting history as well: Sassafras: Next time I’m at the supermarket, I’ll see if they have any.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 11, 2020 21:11:34 GMT -8
Here’s an update to the focus stacking experiment. I used the same five images as before (each focused, from front to back, on one particular plane of the coin). Assembly was done in Affinity Photo this time instead of Photoshop. The results were about the same. But I’ve since learned some techniques in Affinity Photo that allowed me to refine the results with further post-processing. Via Affinity Photo: Affinity ResultsVia Photoshop: Photoshop Results (from first attempt)Old dog. A few new tricks.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 16, 2020 12:45:01 GMT -8
Instead of cleaning up my own garden, I volunteered to help someone with theirs. We did a sprucing up of the local 911 memorial. It was a gloomy day and I didn’t bother trying to photo-edit much of that out. But the rain was light and a group of about 9 showed up to do weeding and (in my case) get the moss and grass out between the paid-for bricks (which lay along that outer curved wall just short of the flag). The leader of this was a little disappointed that no actual members of the specifically-responsible showed up. But we got done what needed doing. As is usually the case, everyone wants to be on a committee but nobody wants to do the work. I got a taste of this when I first started StubbornThings. I thought it was just me at first. But I have since learned that it’s just the way things are. Those who shall remain nameless (and I don’t know their names anyway) didn’t even show up with a new flag as promised. The one you see is quite faded and torn on one edge. But let’s not bicker and argue over 'ho killed 'ho. This is supposed to be a ‘appy occasion. And so it was. We had a great time. KoranovirusCamOkay...I lied. I couldn't help myself. I did brighten that picture up a bit.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 20, 2020 16:20:25 GMT -8
Here's a blast from the past. Does anyone know what this is?
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on May 20, 2020 17:05:03 GMT -8
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 20, 2020 20:37:37 GMT -8
It's an old darkroom timer. You'd plug the enlarger (and a safe light) into it. Set the time for, say, 15 seconds. Hit the button on the lower right and the enlarger light would turn on for fifteen seconds and the overhead safe light (usually a dark red bulb) would go off. When the timer concluded, the enlarger light would shut off and the safe light would come on again.
The center dial glows in the dark. These things were made to survive a nuclear exchange. They're really rugged. And, as you might expect, this one still works. Dug out of the attic while sorting things that needed to be sorted. Great memories attached to this device. At one time I had my own darkroom where I developed and printed black and white. Digital photography has obviously changed things.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on May 20, 2020 20:59:50 GMT -8
Pretty clever the things they could do before the microchip.
I didn't have my own dark room, but I did develop and print black & white photos for some time in our upstairs bathroom. It was quite fun. I must have been about 17.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 20, 2020 21:14:26 GMT -8
That's kool that you had some experience in the darkroom. It could be tedious but also rewarding. Back in the day, you could buy a whole brick of Plus-X film for a reasonable price and take a heck of a lot of photos. This looks similar to the enlarger I had.
|
|
|
Post by kungfuzu on May 20, 2020 21:18:21 GMT -8
I loved transferring the 35mm image to an 8 x 11 inch blank sheet, slip that into the liquid solution and watch the picture appear. You could let it develop more or less and play with the final look. If you didn't get it into the stopping(?) solution fast enough the photo could turn out pretty dark. I cannot recall what type of enlarger I had. I am pretty sure it was the cheapest one could find.
The actual developing of the 35mm film was less fun. I think I generally used 100 as it was the simplest, but I can't really recall. Hard to believe this was about 50 years ago.
|
|
Brad Nelson
Administrator
עַבְדְּךָ֔ אֶת־ הַתְּשׁוּעָ֥ה הַגְּדֹלָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את
Posts: 12,261
|
Post by Brad Nelson on May 21, 2020 6:29:29 GMT -8
The development of 35mm film was somewhat temperature-sensitive, not adding to the fun, for sure. Typically I would prepare a bowl of 72 degree water for a bath, load the film on a reel that looks like this… And put into a canister that looks like this… There was other hardware such as this… In theory, the plastic reel allowed you to “walk” the film onto the reel by moving one side and then the other. It was difficult to make work. Many would say the metal reels were even more difficult. But I tended to use the metal ones even though the learning curve was very steep. But once you got the feel for it (and that was by no means easy…some rolls of film just refused to wind onto the reels easily), there were advantages to the metal containers and reels. You could control the temperature better because the metal was a better heat conductor when you set it into a 72 degree water bath. Once you actually got the damn film onto the reel, as you know, the rest was a piece of cake and perhaps the easiest part of the entire process from shutter to finished print. There are many advantages to digital photography. Doing away with chemicals and the laborious process of developing film and the prints themselves (although, like you, it was fun to see things develop in the tray) was just one of the advantages of digital photography. Perhaps the most appreciated (by me) was that I no longer had to fight dust. Dust in the film development process. Dust in hanging the film to dry. Dust on the negative sleeves. Dust on the lens. Dust on the paper. Dust on the finished film. Dust everywhere. It was a gigantic pain in the ass. One must still keep one’s lens clean in digital photograph. And dust can certainly get on the camera sensor. But eradicating this one problem makes digital photography a relative breeze. And modern software makes it easy to shoot in glorious black-and-white if one wants to. There are many conversion methods (almost too many) to go from color to black-and-white. Most cameras will offer an in-camera mode for that. I remember focus being a pain as well. As the enlarger bulb heated up the negative in the metal sleeve, the focus would change. There were just so many things to fiddle with. Even so, the process was relatively straightforward once you had the film developed. You’d want the solution in the trays to be about at the right temperature, but room temperature is all you really needed. You could, of course, adjust development time on-the-fly by eye. And there was always one last chance to ruin your endeavor. Typically one would need to squeegee the finished (and quite wet) print in order to avoid water spots when it dried. The emulsion at this point was relatively soft so you had to be careful there was no dust (or especially grit) on the squeegee. I used either a matte or gloss paper for prints. But there were other options as well. Gloss gave you (duh) a glossy look but it also was more high contrast. The blacks would really be black and the whites would really be white. Matte paper softened the contrast…which could work especially well for portraiture, for example. If you fixed and washed everything properly, it’s likely that those prints/negs will be good for a hundred years or more. I was just scanning in some old negatives my father had shot when he was 19 years old and in college. They still look as good as the day that he likely developed them. He was an early photography enthusiast. While going through some stuff from my mother’s estate, I found this next photo. Whether someone else shot this or he had it on a self-timer, I don’t know. But this would seem to be my father in January of 1950 in possibly his dorm at Olympic College. Things were quite Spartan back then. Making “safe space” snowflakes was not then the goal of college. CollegeCamNineteen years old. Imagine that. From an even larger version of this scan, you can easily see that it reads “January 1950” on the calendar. And the document on the wall above it is some kind of speech, proclamation, or law from the Senate. It’s signed by John Adams, Vice President and President of the Senate. It’s possible it’s a reprint of the Bill of Rights that was passed in 1791.
|
|
|
Post by timothylane on May 21, 2020 8:41:16 GMT -8
My father was one for both photographs and home movies, which no doubt reflects our tendency to visit a lot of places. (I especially recall them from our time in Greece.) I have no idea what equipment he used or how much effort it took.
|
|