Trump

Oh, yeah. She a big girl.

Good for Melania. This is a good omen.

Elon Musk posted on X:



This guy is the greatest asset we have right now. It's interesting this coalition we have that includes a quite diverse group of people, as noted by those who poke a finger in the eye of the Leftist lying goons who chant about how they are all for "diversity" and yet are a stifling mono-culture of blind conformity.

Yep. That's the separation factor between RINOs/David-Frenchism and people who know this isn't some small disagreement at a cocktail party.

I can't read the article because it's behind a pay wall, but I couldn't agree more with the headline by Kurt Schlichter: "Don't Help the Democrats Figure Out Why They Lost." This should be self-evident. But the chattering, marginally conservative, media world is filled with the chatter of "How the Democrats lost." Hell, even if you think you know, don't tell them. Or lie to them. Tell them they lost because they didn't double-down hard enough on identity politics.

One humbly assumes that the esteemed Mdm. Flu might agree.

A few videos here worth watching.

John Kerry: Now if you want to call someone Hitler, it seems more apt in this case. This guy is pure evil.

Yes, I noticed that as well. A particularity good piece of truth-telling. Women lowered their standards in order, in effect, to act more like men. And then they are surprised that these lowered standards produced ill effects in men and/or attracted men from the lower ranks of the moral spectrum.



Oh, Mr. Kung. You are too modest. I believe you completely understand it just as I do. I think you mean "can't understand" in the sense of being aghast at the extreme foolishness.

I would say it's completely transparent that the quality of "coy" was verbotten for women via feminist doctrine. They had to be more man-like. They had to be aggressive, outgoing, and thus promiscuous. In no sphere of life could a man have something that a woman can't.

Rush received a lot of flack for referring to a particular woman or group of women as "sluts." But he was completely correct. The corollary for men is "hounds." Neither extreme is particularly good, but it does exist. And women, for want of a better term, were impelled to be sluts. You just couldn't say "sluts." You had to choose one of the accepted euphemisms.



Exactly. There is an inherent dynamic in the sexual or social marketplace. Because the female carries a child for nine months and it is a major change for her, this is precisely why females need to be choosy. They need to make males jump through a few hoops first so that they can see if they are serious.

And this is precisely why feminists hold the right to abortion so strongly. It is the thing that frees them from the consequences of their gender. And in the deep recesses of the feminist leaders, pregnancy is seen as a disease. This is precisely behind the demonic euphemism that killing unborn children is a factor of "women's health." And this attitude, like secondhand smoke, filters down to the rest of the women.

In regard to Freud's notion of "penis envy," I think he got that right. Or at least it completely applies to the feminist movement. Man-hating is at the very heart of feminism and always has been. Men must be brought down so that women can rise and dominate. Never – never – was there ever any vision in the dogma of getting along as equal partners. When such rhetoric came up it was only a marketing scheme to get males to give up their natural advantages, as well as the very essence of what makes them masculine.

And one thing this election show is that there has been some push-back in this regard among men.